this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
737 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59331 readers
5262 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 62 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Then Hire cheap human intelligence to correct the AIs hallucinatory trash, trained from actual human generated content in the first place which the original intended audience did understand the nuanced context and meaning of in the first place. Wow more like theyve shovelled a bucket of horse manure on the pizza as well as the glue. Added value to the advertisers. AI my arse. I think calling these things language models is being generous. More like energy and data hungry vomitrons.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Calling these things Artificial Intelligence should be a crime. It's false advertising! Intelligence requires critical thought. They possess zero critical thought. They're stochastic parrots, whose only skill is mimicking human language, and they can only mimic convincingly when fed billions of examples.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's more of a Reddit Collective Intelligence (CI) than an AI.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Collective stupidity more like

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

It's like they made a bot out of the subreddit confidently incorrect.