this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13929 readers
229 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Surely the Supreme Court will remain consistent when it comes to those conservative nation-wide injunctions. Definitely nothing to worry about here.
In a coincidence he was on MSNBC and got to hear him explain he that there was a "silver lining" of "a few positive crumbs". I couldn't follow his comments or his logic at all. It seemed like he was talking in circles. The next legal expert was having none of it. She said there was no silver lining and the ruling was atrocious.
Sounds like a peak-lib “rules based order” fetishist where he still believes the justices are impartial and will apply logic consistently and without political bias.
MSNBC must provide him with a nice little revenue stream. He has a law podcast. He has a Substack. Maybe he's available to give speeches? Maybe he writes books? In any case MSNBC viewers and libs of all kinds do not (and will not) want to hear comments like that. I wonder how strong his convictions are. My hunch is he is unwilling to bite the hand that feeds him and in a day or two he'll say "I believe was too optimistic on the day of the ruling..."
It’s such a West Wing style “clever understander of the legal system” type thought that he’ll probably keep repeating it until proven wrong by the next such case that makes it up to the supremes.
I don't know when the court meet again. January next year? In any case - I'm sure GOP SCOTUS will cripple another bedrock principle of US law. Maybe they'll go after due process? Fun times.