this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
TechTakes
1432 readers
16 users here now
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is the point, exactly. It’s not even that it’s self harm, which even the community recognizes. If that it creates active workplace hazards. Even in a completely remote environment, I wouldn’t want to be a software developer with this guy, because if he came up with a perfect algorithm that broke the build, he would keep moving forward, because the point was the algorithm, and not the fact that prod went down.
I have worked with a couple of these eager shitwits over the years, and they are awful. they'll effortgraft waaaay into a thing that they think is totes the solution, "deliver" it as "done" (aka "here's a branch that already does all that, we can take it live now"), which all so handily allows them to frame any questions/criticism/etc as "don't you think we need ${problem} to be solved?"
the. fucking. worst.
sudden flashback to when $eagerdev pushed a branch that implemented
test-infra
steered by ansible.. in which you needed to write secondary, entirely separate, roles/specs for thetest-infra
thing to "verify"(didn't even try to hook ansible definitions (frankly I wouldn't want to either (but if ansible weren't so fucking shit at what it does _that whole thing wouldn't have been necessary in the first place)))