this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
148 points (97.4% liked)

Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'

973 readers
188 users here now

Rules:

  1. News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.

  2. Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.

  3. Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.

  4. Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.

Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.

Communities We Like:

-Not the Onion

-And finally...

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm okay with the entire party being labeled a domestic terrorist organization.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The communist party and participating in "Communist-actions" were banned in the 50s.

Turns out you can just ban your opposition.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

That did work surprisingly well in the long run (as a plan, not sure it's really had much benefit to the everyday person)

That said, not like plenty of Red team (domestically, everybody would for foreign) doesn't already meet the definition of "terrorist".

ter·ror·ist noun

a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Honestly that's not a very useful term, because lawful is determined by the political system. You're creating a group that contains both non-police brownshirts going onto campuses to beat up students and any student protesters using violence to defend themselves.

In practice, it just means enemy of the state.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

That's another thing, they make blatantly unlawful and unconstitutional (at a federal level) legislature at the local and state levels, and let it be fought over in courts, with the hope it makes it to the supreme court and maybe becomes legal. While they argue and fight over it, it impacts real people.

Ergo, unlawful violence (arrests) and intimidation (suppression of rights) against civilians, for political aims

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Lawful is always going to be defined by whether the state likes you or not.

Whether the state likes you is the difference between freedom fighter and terrorist.

It's better to accept this and understand that using intimidation and violence, including state violence to suppress reactionaries is good, while using intimidation and violence to suppress the left is bad than to play games with what is and isn't terrorism.