this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
592 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59448 readers
3724 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
592
1000+ Firefox for Android extensions now available – Mozilla Add-ons Community Blog (blog.mozilla.org)
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
70 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The new open ecosystem of extensions on Firefox for Android launched in December with just over 400 extensions. Less than five months later we’ve surpassed 1,000 Firefox for Android extensions. That’s an impressive achievement by this developer community! It’s exciting to see so many developers embrace the opportunity to explore new creative possibilities for mobile browser customization.

What are some of your favorite new Firefox for Android extensions?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Can you list some of those, I'm curious.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

I couldn't find a list but here is the source for mull

https://gitlab.com/divested-mobile/mull-fenix

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

DRM plugin and all the built-in cloud stuff is proprietary on the server side

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I mean, that's not surprising though is it? If a FOSS tool I made has an additional feature that requires my own backend to support, then there has to be a backend to support it.

The FE that uses it is still FOSS, and one could always build their own API to the specs outlined by the client.

They could OSS their server side code ofc, that'd be cool. But that also takes sometimes double the effort to do well, and keep custom tweaks and changes either separate and proprietary, or build out a complex way for them to be dynamically injected. So I don't really blame them on that one tbh.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago

(the sync can actually be self-hosted and is OSS, the DRM is third-party and proprietary)