this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Archaeology

2269 readers
15 users here now

Welcome to c/Archaeology @ Mander.xyz!

Shovelbums welcome. πŸ—Ώ


Notice Board

This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.


About

Archaeology or archeology[a] is the study of human activity through the recovery and analysis of material culture. The archaeological record consists of artifacts, architecture, biofacts or ecofacts, sites, and cultural landscapes.

Archaeology has various goals, which range from understanding culture history to reconstructing past lifeways to documenting and explaining changes in human societies through time.

The discipline involves surveying, excavation, and eventually analysis of data collected, to learn more about the past. In broad scope, archaeology relies on cross-disciplinary research. Read more...

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. No pseudoscience/pseudoarchaeology.



Links

Archaeology 101:

Get Involved:

University and Field Work:

Jobs and Career:

Professional Organisations:

FOSS Tools:

Datasets:

Fun:

Other Resources:



Similar Communities


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Plants & Gardening

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Memes


Find us on Reddit

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The influential idea that in the past men were hunters and women were not isn’t supported by the available evidence

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Maybe I'm mistaken but... I never heard that was an evolutionary thing? Just what the roles were?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

Try watching 90s sitcoms. Gender essentialism was still ok in public discourse so you hear a lot of 'because men were designed to hunt' to explain unrelated behaviour.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Think about it like this:

If you're going out with weapons to hunt with, are you also going to ignore the berries and herbs and mushrooms you find? If you're going out with baskets to bring back materials for foraging, are you going to feel stupid for not also bringing along a sling or spear when you see some small game?

Yes, statistically speaking, men have more strength and lung capacity than women. That would generally make men more effective at hunting, but that doesn't mean that women didn't hunt at all.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Oh no don't misunderstand I'm not trying to say that the whole hunter gather roles are correct. Just saying that, till now, I've always heard that's what it was. Roles. Not evolution.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

Yeah, and what I'm saying is that in the nomadic hunter-gatherer days, I think it's unlikely for those roles to have emerged very strongly. We're talking about pure subsistence, and in that paradigm, you don't leave resources behind no matter who you are.

It's not until agriculture comes around that people start putting down permanent roots in one place. Now you don't have to expend effort on traveling, rebuilding shelter, moving resources. You get the luxury of storing more resources than you can carry. That's what allows people to start specializing and shifting into specific roles.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

Such things are roughly considered to be either evolutionary or cultural.

The further back you go in human history, the less influence culture is assumed to have.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

I think there has always been a vague yet unproven theory about it, that males generally developed to be bigger because they were more commonly in hunting roles. The kind of thing a teacher might say in high school but not really back up with anything. This could only really apply to mammals, though - in other species, eg often with birds, females are bigger. However the reason behind the size difference probably has a lot more involved in it than simply which sex did more hunting.