this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
438 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59161 readers
1940 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

The military isn't buying from Amazon, they buy from "xyz hardware supplies ltd", who buy from Amazon and charge three times the price to the military.

Some will be companies that specialise in sourcing obsolete hardware, who just buy shit off Amazon/eBay and issue the correct paperwork.

I've read that the US government has to give preference in contract bids to small businesses, veteran owned, woman owned, etc, businesses, which is great in theory, but it can create situations like this.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

I'm sorry, but such things happen in countries with no preference to small businesses and veterans etc.

I'm almost confident that somebody involved in choosing that supplier got a cut.

After all, US military budget is so ridiculously big that not having such kinds of corruption would be weird.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

but it can create situations like this.

Only if proper vetting of the contractor isn't done. That part of the process should happen regardless of who the contractor is.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It's insane to me all the different ways the government procures things.

Just get it straight from the manufacturer. Then if anything ever goes wrong there isn't the "who is REALLY to blame on this long chain of people" it's "hey this shit is broken, YOU are responsible for it"

Of course sometimes they do it as a form of opsec, if you distribute parts across many small time sellers it's easier to hide something than one big order from the primary source.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Did you not read the comment you're replying to? They mentioned obsolete hardware. Cisco does not sell obsolete hardware.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I suspect the plausible deniability of responsibility is a feature not a bug to many of the bureaucrats.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

And more complexity is always good for corruption, since every additional kind of complexity introduces gray areas where it's unclear who's to blame.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

The beurocracy must expand to meet the increasing needs of the growing beurocracy.