Unpopular Opinion
Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!
How voting works:
Vote the opposite of the norm.
If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.
Guidelines:
Tag your post, if possible (not required)
- If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
- If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].
Rules:
1. NO POLITICS
Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.
2. Be civil.
Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...
Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.
5. No trolling.
This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
view the rest of the comments
This point of view is like extroverts forcing introverts to talk when they don't want to.
Well if they don’t want to talk then they shouldn’t get a vote. I’ve seen post that have hundreds of upvotes that say something like let’s talk about x but no replies.
That’s the point of something like lemmy to discuss a topic. It’s not just for downvote or upvotes.
It's just my personal opinion, but this seems too exclusionary to me. Just because someone doesn't want to talk doesn't mean they don't want to participate at all, and I don't think that excluding someone just because they don't have a specific statement to make will add value. Perversely, it might encourage low-effort commenting (first!) just for access to voting.
It is called social media for a reason.
Personally, I don't care about upvotes for downvotes. I suspect the reason you see users declining is because there isn't much content or interaction. Eventually it will become either a niche or just die off.
I've seen quite a few people saying this recently, but it doesn't match my experience. I'm having more interesting conversations with more people than a year ago, and I see new content every day. Maybe your instance has defederated with too many others?
Do you mean lemmy as a whole? I don't think so, it's definitely been growing. I think people forget how small reddit was for such a long time. It used to be a joke there that you wouldn't get new blue links until 8am on the US east coast.
Lemm.ee is great about letting you decide what to filter. I can't say enough good things about the admin.
It's been a while since I've seen the number, but last I saw, they were trending down on all counts.
Ok, there's no reason to assume that a recent downward trend means a long-term downward trend, just as there was no reason to assume that the upward trend from last year would be long-term. Variation is normal.
If you want lemmy to be more active, make it more active. If you want users to engage more, then give them something to engage with. Every user is part of what happens here, even more than on reddit.