this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
259 points (99.2% liked)

People Twitter

5220 readers
1888 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
259
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 61 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Under very, very limited circumstances, maybe. Like you need gas to get to work now, get paid tomorrow, and have nothing in your account? Yeah, maybe, but that's an expensive tank of gas for someone that's that short on cash.

OTOH, I can't count the number of times where my former bank processed my paycheck last--even though it went in first--and then hit me with overdraft fees for buying groceries, gas, paying bills, etc. (This was National City Bank; they ended up losing a class action lawsuit about it, but they still made more money from their theft than they had to pay back out.)

IMO, there should be zero overdraft fees; if the money isn't in your account, the charge is declined. All of this shit should be done in real-time, instead of waiting for a merchant to post at the end of the day. This is the twenty-fucking-second century, and it's not that goddamn hard.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Blud it's the twenty-first century

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I think the real issue is that dudes living in 2124 and overdraft fees are still around.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

It seems Lemmy is also still around... so, a little bit of good made it?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Or even better, make banks immediately start treating any negative balance as a credit. There can be a low limit, but enforce a low interest rate. For all that banks have done to us, I feel like this is literally the least they can do—and shit, they’d still turn more profit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

This is actually not a terrible idea. Though interest rates in general need to be capped on lines of credit of all varieties. The fact that 45% interest on a credit card is not being brought up on usury charges is insane.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Upsetting to hear banks don't get any better a century from now. Good luck to you future man.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

What's funny is that it looked odd when I read it, but I just quickly brushed it off as a "well you don't see it written often."