Privacy

31263 readers

379 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

157

deleted by creator (www.ghacks.net)

submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Google warns users of these apps that their experience may deteriorate soon. They may "experience buffering issues" or see errors such as "the following content is not available on this app" when trying to watch videos.

Similar to Google Search, ads have become insufferable for many users of the service. There are too many of them, they may break the viewing experience, and they may show inappropriate content.

YouTube Premium is expensive. What weights more for some users is that its functionality is severely limited when compared to third-party apps.

The cat and mouse game continues.

For those looking to avoid ads or improve privacy, here are some options for free, open source, privacy-friendly frontends to YouTube without advertisements:

https://www.privacyguides.org/en/frontends/#youtube

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

as long as the content is publicly available they cannot block yt-dlp, buffer at best.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if at some point they start doing something like what Twitter did and require login to view the content.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They might but if they do they'll lose a huge revenue because a lot of website have Youtube videos embedded. Imagine you have to login to view an embedded video. Even website owners won't like that because their videos won't load automatically and they will start to seek alternative options. So I don't think Google would take that risk soon.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

It may not be too bad for users: a lot of people are simply always logged on, so they'll not see any difference. What is the current share of Chrome?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I think yt-dlp lets you use your login credentials?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yes. The thing is that then you are no longer anonymously using yt-dlp.
The next step would be trying to detect that case.. maybe adding captchas when there's even a slight suspicion.
Perhaps even to the point of banning users (and then I hope you did not rely on the same account for gmail or others).
It'll be a cat and mouse situation. Similar as it happened with Twitter, there are also third party apps, but many gave up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Yup, it has a --cookies flag to either use an exported cookies file from your browser, or if using Firefox just tell it and it'll grab it automagically.