this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
200 points (96.3% liked)

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles

3202 readers
1 users here now

We have moved to:

[email protected]

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion.
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling.
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think the US has the whole subsidy game upside down - governments should subsidize societally positive actions even if companies are currently not doing them

Your bang on here. Externalities are a must. Most economists love them, but they tend to be unpopular with the public.

But I think you miss the point. Cycling, rail, micromobilty, high density are what should absolutely be subsidised. Instead they are taxes more than they should be and cars and suburbs and subsidised because, well I don't know why lobbying I guess.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

I live in a place where cycling is the norm for short trips, trains are for longer trips. I still understand that the US is currently fucked up with their infrastructure to the point that people will need to buy cars either way.

Cities and metropolitan areas should be free of car dependency, but rural places will need something. And that something would better be an EV rather than another F150.