It does result in higher methane emissions, which have a ln ~30x larger greenhouse effect than CO2.

See here: https://youtu.be/K2oL4SFwkkw

Edit: Looks like metane's GGG co2 equivalent is 27 to 30 over 100 years.

https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/understanding-global-warming-potentials

Burning natural gas isn't so awful but getting it out of the ground and to the place where is needs to be burned is always overlooked. It's a gas, it wants to escape and much of the infrastructure leaks and so a great deal is lost before its used. I walk around Boston and no joke you just SMELL it all the time because the infrastructure is so old. Natural gas is also mostly methane which when leaked is 80 times more potent than CO2. Furthermore much natural gas needs to be transported on ships to be uses. To summarize there is no 'greener' fossil fuels it's all to be avoided if possible.

Sure, the primary dutch co2 source website: https://www-co2emissiefactoren-nl.translate.goog/lijst-emissiefactoren/?_x_tr_sl=nl&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp

Translated, because nobody speaks dutch.

Cleaner than coal is a very low bar. 60% of the emissions of coal is still way too much

That's the states for actually burned natural gas. Natural gas is basically methane and is therefore not too good for the climate when it leaks (which it does)