this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

HistoryPorn

4847 readers
7 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  9. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's pretty amazing how they let that guy just harass a tank for several minutes and even climb on it, then just kinda let him be led away by bystanders.

https://youtu.be/qq8zFLIftGk

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

For some reason growing up I think everyone assumed he got ran over or killed?

Because hundreds if not thousands of others were (others have already linked the graphic content).

Also, seeing him being led away in this footage is zero evidence that he survived his protest (unsurprisingly, there is no documentation of him or what the government did to him, but considering what they did to others like him, there is very little room to doubt that he didn't make it).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I'll play devil's advocate - the photographs don't seem to show evidence of thousands dying, or even hundreds necessarily. Dozens, absolutely. I doubt we'll ever know the actual numbers, though. Clearly something awful happened.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There are photos of dozens dead and tossed to the side like a garbage bag, both on the streets and in hospitals. Do you seriously think that's the sort of thing which happens when only a few people died?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I don't claim a strong position. I suppose if I had to say, I believe the estimates of between 2-800 dead, mostly in the streets surrounding Tiananmen Square, with a dozen or so police lynchings amongst that number. But it would be weird for me to be overly attached to that as an opinion, as the evidence is unclear. I think Beijing hospital records suggest about 400, so that seems like a safe lower estimate.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think Beijing hospital records suggest about 400

That'd be the 400 they managed to find with their bodies in a good enough condition to identify. Have you seen the literal human paste?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Yes, it's a reasonable minimum estimate. What is it that you're disagreeing with? I've certainly seen all the pictures. But have a read about the declassified diplomatic cables, it's interesting. Notably, the mountains of flesh being burned with flamethrowers probably didn't happen. I have no stake in that, it's the current position held by the US Government. What happened is still monstrous.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I’ll play devil’s advocate

Devil's one of the most powerful countries in the world, with people on this platform regularly repeating its propaganda, including in this thread.

Not sure the devil needs an advocate in this case.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

It always does, imo. Most of the time devil’s advocate isn’t meant to actually “defend” anything, but to find flaws/imperfections in your logic so you can adjust it and when you have to argue with an actual ~~Xi bootlicker~~ “devil”, they’ll have less ammo to refute your point.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

It always does, imo.

Not always. Sometimes it's just amplifying the devil's arguments by repetition. Time and place, and all that jazz.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The initial exaggeration was probably unintentional, due to second-hand eyewitness testimony getting relayed as fact in the middle of the chaos. But it was later used to pretend nothing happened, which clearly isn't the case. My girlfriend is Chinese and has no idea anything ever happened in Tiananmen Square: she didn't even know that date was censored online, so whatever they're doing is working very well.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Weird saying when you think about it that way.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

There's a reason they only show a picture instead of the video.