this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
439 points (99.5% liked)
Gaming
19983 readers
68 users here now
Sub for any gaming related content!
Rules:
- 1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
- 2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
- 3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
PSA: if you own the crew, consider taking action.
https://www.stopkillinggames.com
Is their removal of these licenses a measure to somehow prevent people from taking action?
Kinda wish I had the crew so that I could clown on these Mfers
I own the crew, but honestly think it's a shit game that's not worth my attention.
The Crew was great in its time. It was basically the bridge between Test Drive Unlimited (superior open world gameplay) and early Forza Horizon (superior driving physics). Later Forza Horizon games simply took all the good gameplay features from both TLU and The Crew and is unmatched in quality now.
The Crew 2 was worse than both its predecessor and the competing Forza Horizon at that time, so if you were talking about that I'd half agree. But it's still a problematic industry trend worth stopping.
The idea is that since the company is French and France has excellent consumer protection, The Crew is the best example of this practice to fight
It's not about whether the game is good, it's about Ubisoft being French
Didn't know that. Thanks!
Also every time I hear about France, I like them more.
It's not about this particular game.
It's about setting a precedent for games you do care about.
The games I care about will be preserved no matter how the publishers of them flail about
Not in this case, seeing that progress is stored online.
Who says that the game you care about tomorrow won't do this next? Why be against an action/not care about something that can only benefit players now and in the long term?
The games I care about all already have backup options. They're all the kinds of games that attract people like me who will just fix them right away.
I mean, God forbid Ubisoft gets its way and all games go this direction! Step up before you don't get the choice to backup your games.
Maybe raise a stink with your attorney general and/or representative, too. The whole idea that a company can sell licenses for something and then arbitrarily decide they don't want to do it anymore and revoke all the licenses doesn't sound legal. And if it is, it doesn't sound like it should be.
Especially if you live outside of the US!