this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

Apple

17476 readers
76 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

27% is usurious. How much money is enough for Apple? Just because they are slightly less evil than others is no excuse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Valve takes 30% too via steam. This is industry standard pricing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The problem with Apple is that it holds a monopoly on its platforms. On Windows, if you don’t like Steam or its pricing, you can go to Epic, GOG, or other storefronts. You can buy physical. On non-macOS Apple devices, you’re stuck with the App Store because Apple doesn’t allow competing storefronts.

Apple is third in the world by revenue in gaming (behind Tencent and Sony, and ahead of Microsoft), without being a developer or publisher. This is all thanks to the combination of its 30% cut and lack of competition.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Xbox, Playstation and Nintendo take 30% cuts for their platforms too.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

Tbf all of those are holdouts from old video game licenses. (That I also don't agree with)

Apple set the standard for the app store cut and gets that cut on a lot more than video games as well as having a much more needed use case (phones are closer to a need than a console) that you can't get around.

I consider iPhones and iPads to be personal computers and of all personal computers they are the only ones that don't allow you to get applications from 3rd parties.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Whataboutism doesn't justify anything. There are quite a few nuances. For example that Android and iOS have way higher adoption numbers than game consoles, and that these OSes play a crucial role in people's everyday lives. In addition, do these platforms have a duopoly, so perfect competition doesn't exist on that level, and like elboomy states, does Apple have a monopoly on its own platform. Apple forcing a piece of the cake is thus merely a power play which is enabled by the imperfect market of smartphone OSes and their app stores.