this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
96 points (99.0% liked)
Offbeat
1250 readers
50 users here now
The world is a weird place filled with even weirder news.
Post your funny, weird, strange, or quirky news stories here!
Lemmy.ca Rules
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No porn.
- No Ads / Spamming.
Community Rules
- No editorialized titles
- No satire news sites (The Beaverton, The Onion, etc...)
- No politics
- Submissions must be no older than 2 months (i.e. the article should be "recent" news)
Similar Communities
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The previous property owners are also suing the builder... Like why?
The home remains empty except for some squatters. Wowee
You read that wrong sport. The developer named the previous owners of the lot in their suit. And the architect that designed the house.
No, the developers are suing the previous owners of the lot, along with like 8 other parties.
Looks like a shotgun attempt to get anyone to pay for their fuckup.