Technology

59296 readers

4519 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

185

NASA needs your smartphone during April's solar eclipse (www.popsci.com)

submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago (3 children)

A rotating spheroid will oblate when its centrifugal force generates enough inertia to slightly flatten it out into a more irregular, elliptical shape.

I didn't know inertia could be generated. I thought mass just had inertia. Could someone explain? Are they talking out of their ass or is that statement actually accurate?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

They are talking about Moment of Inertia. Inertia wrt to rotation changes with how they are positioned in reference to the spinning axis. Think slender bodies are easier to rotate compared to wider bodies with same mass. That’s what they mean when earth slightly flattens out its becoming less slender and more difficult to rotate

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Inertia is the tendency of objects in motion to stay in motion, and objects at rest to stay at rest, unless a force causes its speed or direction to change. from Wikipedia

So they're kind of just saying that once it picks up enough rotational speed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Thank you! I appreciate it. I had a hunch they were sloppy with the term "inertia", and this confirms it for me, assuming I'm understanding it correctly.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

~~I think whoever wrote it just used the wrong word because yes inertia is dependent on mass, not momentum~~

Okay I actually decided to check and I think it just a poorly written explanation of rotational inertia

A rotating spheroid will oblate when its centrifugal force generates enough ~~inertia~~ angular momentum to slightly flatten it out into a more irregular, elliptical shape.

If the shape also changes, this would mean distribution of that mass relative to the axis of rotation would also have changed, which if I'm reading this right, affects rotational inertia.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Thank you! I knew I wasn't crazy... 😬