this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)
Political Humor
1235 readers
26 users here now
Welcome to Political Humor!
Rules:
- Be excellent to each other.
- No harassment.
- No sexism, racism or bigotry.
- All arguments should be made in good faith.
- No misinformation. Be prepared to back up your factual claims with evidence.
- All posts should relate to politics and be of a humorous nature.
- No bots, spam or self-promotion.
- If you want to run a bot, ask first.
- Site wide rules apply.
- Have fun.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The whole WMD situation is so shit. Iran cant have a stalemate to prevent attacks on them if they dont have nuclear weapons, so they would be attacked all the time to prevent them from having one. Yet their regime is also the one which is not a friendly to neighbors and has barely any friendly allies therefore it is in the best interests of the rest of the world that they won't get nuclear weapons. And again, preventing them from having it would allow Israel to bomb them freely.
Dunno how others see it, but no matter what side I try to look at this issue at, this is all looks bad and worse than the previous angle. Sad to acknowledge that Iranians have to go through this. Even if regime fails, I bet it'll take many decades for Iranians to become a free of regime state.
I'm pretty sure the zio regime is least friendly to the people who are actually from the middle east. The zio regime is literally bombing Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Yemen, etc. They have an overt plan to steal land from bascially every country. They're engaged in an active genocide.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_Israel
It's definitely in the interest of humanity to disarm these nuclear terrorists.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samson_Option
How long until the middle east is free from the zio terror regime?
Gotta be delusional AF to think Iran is the problem here.