this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
294 points (88.7% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35472 readers
362 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

(Title shamelessly stolen from this comment in the crossposted [email protected] thread.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (6 children)

They were riding it on a sidewalk, through a crosswalk and someone turned into them. Of course.

One caveat I'll say is that depending on how fast they were going the laws should be that they should be with traffic, because if I'm driving and I look right I may not notice someone going 40+ mph on a sidewalk. But even then the law should be "Where do ebikes belong" officially

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

I hate cyclists that masquerade as pedestrians. It’s less safe for them and it’s less safe for everyone. Get your ass out into traffic and learn to take up some space. Ride defensively. Get yourself a rear view mirror. Pick the most bike friendly route. For fucks sake.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

I once made a left turn through a gap in the crowd downtown, then out of the ongoing crowd zips out a bike the opposite way out of nowhere. He almost hit the side of my car and of course he got mad at me, even though he was on the sidewalk which is illegal in my city, and he was riding against traffic

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

In NYC, maniacs ride ebikes and mopeds on both the sidewalk and the street as it benefits them. Every time I walk my dog I have to dodge the fuckers going full speed down the sidewalk. And they always glare at the pedestrians like you're the problem.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

In other words, cyclists denied appropriate infrastructure are forced to use infrastructure for other transportation modes inappropriately.

But sure, blame the "maniacs" for having no other choice.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

cyclists denied appropriate infrastructure

Clearly you've never been to NYC... There's bike lanes everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

They also have a choice to follow the rules of the sidewalk they’re hopping on. Y’all are having this cars vs bikes thing and I’m happy for you but now you’re endangering pedestrians by getting onto pedestrian infrastructure without following pedestrian rules.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

There are bike lanes, people are just assholes. Usually they hop on the sidewalk because they don't want to wait at a red light.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

One of the many reasons you don't ride anything on the sidewalk is that you cross driveways and crosswalks too quickly to be seen by drivers. Even a standard bike should be ridden in the road, because 15 mph is fast enough to "come out of nowhere" and be hit by a car. All bikes are road vehicles.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I always ride on the side walk if there is one. I'd rather get hit by someone backing up at 5mph than someone going down the road at 50mph. And I'm always watching driveways for cars backing up.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You are less safe for this. You think otherwise, but you’re wrong. Sidewalk. Side. Walk.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

It's because you're exactly in their blind spot. If they're on the street and you're on the sidewalk next to them. They'll run you over at the next junction, as it has happened in this case. It's always right turns and things to the side of cars. And you'll be exactly there when cycling on the sidewalk.

Additionally car drivers don't anticipate fast moving things on the sidewalk. They'll have a quick glance at the sidewalk directly before and after the junction. Because a pedestrian can only move so far in the time until they made the turn. Then they'll watch out for other traffic on the street, signals and so on. In the meantime you'll emerge out of nowhere on the pavement, moving at 5x the speed of anything that's anticipated to be there and that's going to be a problem.

I don't know how it's in the US. But generally you should just cycle in plain sight directly infront of them on the road. It's difficult to miss that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (2 children)

When cycling (and driving tbh) I assume everyone's an idiot and they're going to hit me until proven otherwise. I don't cross a street at full speed and assume everyone's going to see me. I make eye contact and don't cross unless they see me and start slowing down.

Cycling directly infront of cars seems like the optimal way to generate road rage, impede traffic, and endanger your own life.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

For the better part of the past 25 years I've been bicycling primarily in US cities. The only time I've been hit by a car was when I was on the sidewalk. Long story short, I thought we had made eye contact, but I think they didn't see me because I was moving quicker than a pedestrian would.

I've never really felt unsafe, except for maybe in Texas where pickups would cut way too close to me. But I learned to take a whole lane, which is my right, when there were multiple lanes.

In your defense, now I live in a dense suburb and we have a 2 lane 25mph road that is an alternate route if the highway is backedup. I bike on the sidewalk there because some people fly up and down those roads, while others do the speed limit, and I'm afraid I will be missed by people weaving around. Also the sidewalk along that section I use tends to be pretty quiet, when I ride, so I rarely have to deal with pedestrians. But I'm certainly on high alert for the roads and driveways I cross.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

As I said I don't know how driving is in the US. I heard it's really bad in some places. I know it's the way we do it here. There is just one road and cars and bicycles need to get along and share it. It's not always easy, you're right with that. But the sideway isn't an option. Pedestrians and bicycles don't mix well and there regularly are really bad accidents. And the cyclists also get killed by cars there.

There are studies. You end up having a 10x or 20x higer chance to die when cycling on the sideway by being missed by a car driver (I forgot the exact numbers). You can try and mitigate for that by really paying attention yourself, slowing down etc. Keeping track of all the cars around you. I'm not sure if you end up at the same chance to die as if you were cycling on the street. I'd hop off my bike and walk it across the junction if i were on the sideway.

Btw. is it legal to cycle on a sideway where you live?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

I'm aware of the studies, but I can't get past the uneasy sensation when a 10-ton semi truck drives by me at 50mph.

I'm not sure if it's technically legal to cycle on the sidewalk, but I've seen other people on bikes do it and I've rode past police officers and I've never been stopped or told not too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

If you have no bicycle safe routes then sadly you should not be biking. Taking it onto the sidewalk not only endangers you in all the ways described in this thread, it also endangers pedestrians. Someone said they wouldn’t care about getting hit by a car coming out of a driveway, because that’s slower than a car on the street. Fine. But if I step out from my the huge bush my neighbor keeps on the boundary of our driveways, onto the sidewalk, and you crash your bike into me I’m going to feed it to you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I think you're right. Having a semi go past you at 50mph is mental.

I think at some point I need a detailed lecture on how cycling feels in the USA or go and see for myself. It's really difficult for me to judge all of this. Only thing I can say is the sidewalk is a very, very dangerous alternative. But it might very well be the case that you don't have a good alternative.

We usually avoid sharing roads where cars drive at 50mph. Most of the time it's 30mph where you'd get in such a situation. You're allowed to use the sidewalk if you're younger than 10 yo. It's plain illegal for people older than that. In the city cars have to keep a minimum distance of 1.5m to bicycles, that's about 5 feet in crazy people's units. Usually that means the car drivers are forced to switch lanes when going past a bicycle. And it's a bit more sideways distance outside of the cities. All of those rules are written in blood. We're not good at sharing the roads, but car drivers slowly learn to abide by the law and actually keep that distance, it's really getting better in recent times. (But far from perfect.) And my city is half-heartedly building some more bicycle lanes and seperate small roads across the city, exclusive to bicycles. All of that is a major effort and we still get accidens on a regular basis.

Take care.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Pavement. Pave. Ment. Ment for paves

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I’d rather get hit by someone backing up at 5mph than someone going down the road at 50mph.

  1. It's not about cars backing out of residential driveways; it's about cars turning onto side streets and it happens at a lot more than 5 MPH.

  2. Cyclists being rear-ended (at 50 MPH or otherwise) while riding in the street is much less likely to happen than them being t-boned while riding on the sidewalk. You have to factor the probability into the risk, not just the severity.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

it’s about cars turning onto side streets and it happens at a lot more than 5 MPH.

I have mirrors, so I check behind me for cars turning right and I can see oncoming traffic for cars turning left.

You have to factor the probability into the risk, not just the severity

My primary concern is the severity. I feel way less safe riding in the street. All it takes is a semi-truck swerving a few feet, a drunk driver not paying attention, or someone looking at their phone at the wrong moment and it's game over for me. The stretch of my commute that I have to share the road with cars is the worst part and if I had to do that the whole way I simply wouldn't cycle anymore.

The real problem is a lack of bike infrastructure, but until that is resolved I'm going to ride where I feel safe and that is as far away from cars as possible. And I'm not on an ebike, just a regular one. I only go 10-15 mph.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Seconded, but not on an ebike. And still use an abundance of caution when crossing the street (I'll even dismount and walk if I think visibility is low). I try to minimize that by finding a bike path, but you can't always live next to a bike path.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Someone going 40+ MPH is doing what amounts to riding a small motorcycle down a sidewalk. That's no longer a "bicycle" thing. Imagine the howling and pearl-clutching we would be reading if someone were caught blasting, say, a Honda Grom down a sidewalk like that. Which is already illegal, for obvious reasons.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I own an ebike and I use it on the mixed use trails in my city. Mostly I have it because I often pull my kids on a trailer bike and we have hills in town.

I fear that my riding on these trails will soon be banned because people are out there driving stupidly fast on big knobby-tired motorcycles masquerading as “e-bikes.”

There are tons of Karens pushing strollers on these trails and any election now they’re going to ban my bike.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Sad, but in a lot of places unenforceable. My city can ban whatever they want, but they don't have the manpower to wipe after they shit. :D

I hope the Karen's leave you alone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Unenforced is a little different than unenforceable.

Society is unfortunately still functioning where I live.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Just to be clear, "40+ MPH" is wildly inaccurate to the point of being a strawman argument. If the e-bike the kid was on was any sort of normal -- and there's nothing in either the article about the law or the article about the collision linked from it to indicate otherwise -- then it was going no more than 20 MPH, tops.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Let's not downplay how fast 20mph is on the sidewalk. When you're expecting people to be moving at 4mph, 5 times that is ridiculously fast.

Additionally, according to your article, they are capped at 28mph. Which is stupid fast on a sidewalk.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Additionally, according to your article, they are capped at 28mph.

That's class 3. The vast majority of e-bikes are class 2.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

40mph is probably a bit extreme, but "20mph, tops" is also pretty low

E bike laws, terminology, and manufacturers can be kind of a wild patchwork of nonsensical bullshit but a lot of states recognize, with some degree of regulation or restrictions, what have commonly come to be called class 3 e bikes, that can go up to 28mph, and in my shopping around I've seen plenty that advertise that speed or even higher.

There's a lot of imported e bikes that play fast and loose with the regulations and their quality control, and I'm sure there's a dedicated bunch of people tinkering with their bikes to make them go faster and remove built-in restrictions, so there's probably a lot of people zooming around at 30+MPH

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

The vast majority of e-bikes (other than weird Chinese shit from ebay) are class 2.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

One caveat I’ll say is that depending on how fast they were going the laws should be that they should be with traffic, because if I’m driving and I look right I may not notice someone going 40+ mph on a sidewalk. But even then the law should be “Where do ebikes belong” officially

40mph is twice as fast as the max (motor assist) speed of a normal class 2 e-bike, but yeah, the real problem here is lack of proper bike infrastructure.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

My city has amazing bike infrastructure: mixed use trails with no cars, bike lanes on all streets, tunnels and bridges over major thoroughfares (really it’s pretty insanely good and yes it’s in the US of fucking A).

People still ride on the sidewalks like morons. They ride the wrong direction in the bike lanes.

Bike infrastructure is essential but also not totally sufficient. You need a significant enough number of people using them that there is a culture for it and tribal sharing of knowledge around it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

It is trivial to kit-build an e-bike that will do this. Hell, I have one myself, constructed out of a Warp DS2 frame.

But the difference is, I also have an M endorsement and I treat my monster bicycle as a motorcycle. The law doesn't -- that's actually impossible in my state, so my bike falls in between a registrable motor vehicle and a bicycle. It also has turn signals, a car horn, a headlight, and working brake lights. But I also don't ride it like a dickhead, and that includes paths set aside for non-fire-breathing bicycles, sidewalks, etc.