this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
23 points (96.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43397 readers
1190 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Most of the time when people say they have an unpopular opinion, it turns out it's actually pretty popular.

Do you have some that's really unpopular and most likely will get you downvoted?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Pansexual, polysexual, and omnisexual are all microlabels and are all subsets of bisexual. You don't need more labels than gay, straight, and bi.

Edit: I forgot about asexuals. But I specifically only care about bi subsets. They're dumb, and you only need bi

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

As a pansexual I feel that Bi and Pan have enough differences to both be justified while the others are micro labels (not invalid, just less useful as labels).

But I recognize I'm drawing that line very conveniently for myself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Here's an unpopular opinion: you don't need any labels at all. You love who you live, you fuck who you fuck, you can advertise what you're looking for if you want to but all this identity business obscures the reality that humans are far more diverse and interesting than the boxes we build for ourselves.

Most people who call themselves straight would fuck someone from their own gender if there weren't cultural expectations against it hammered into them from and early age. Most people who call themselves gay would wander if they found someone they connected with. Very few of us rest at one end of any spectrum or matrix. Most of us are somewhere in the middle, and far more mobile than we might realize.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Atheism isn't a religion, likewise asexuality is not a sexual orientation, but the lack of one, I say.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Upvoted, but I have a slight disagreement. I think bisexual should actually be a label under pansexual. Bisexual doesn’t necessarily account for anyone outside the gender binary.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Yes it does. Read the bisexual manifesto.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Out of interest, why? Shouldn't it be the other way around, that bi is a subset of pan?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Read the bisexual manifesto. Bi has always included nonbinary people. If you are attracted to all genders, both bisexual and pansexual are valid labels you can choose.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

If we're splitting hairs, bi should be a sunset of pan.

Also, there is some need for a fourth "none of the above" label...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And here I thought pansexual meant you really like cookware.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Is that really what you thought, or just an attempt at humor? Be honest ;)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I agree. All the little bitty addages don't make sense. You can be bi and still have preferences. Just keep it simple gosh dangit.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not understanding what words mean isn't an unpopular opinion, you're just wrong

Not about the first bit, that's arguable

You definitely DO need more labels than straight, gay, and bi. For example: asexual or sapiosexual, those don't fit into any of the 3 you listed

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess we found the actual unpopular opinion on this.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a very silly name, I love it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sapiosexual means you have a preference for smart people. Its not a sexuality.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Can't agree more. The microlabels are too much at this point. You do not need mix sexual orientation, which is the sex we are naturally attracted to, with having preferences, which are the qualities we find attractive in a person or a relationship. The two are completely separate.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

And asexual

But I agree. The bi community already collectively decided we are trans and nonbinary inclusive. We don't need to further separate it out.