A better approach is to optimistically merge most changes as soon as not-rocket-science allows it, and then later review the code in situ, in the main branch.
I upvoted before reviewing the article in situ, then I had to go back and fix my upvote.
xoggy
joined 1 year ago
- portable development environment with tmux + neovim + whatever toolchain I'm working in
- various projects I'm developing such as bots or web tools that need uptime or I just don't want to tie down to my local machine
- BOINC
- immich
- minidlna
- nginx reverse proxy with various personal websites behind it
- rsync backup jobs on systemd timers
- rtorrent
- veilid node
Maybe not, but somebody inevitably is. I was never a fan of the arch mods banning necrobumping because if that's the topic thread that comes up in search engine results then it makes sense for the answer to live with the question.
Gotta love the heavy use of buzzword technologies and no actual information on what is actual is. Then you click the "How does it work?" button and it takes you to a Google powerpoint... so much for the sleek website design.
Think about it though. When people say they want to "code AI" what they typically mean is they want to play with prompts and waste electricity on garbage models, not actually write any of the underlying models that power AI.
Him being naked is completely unnecessary but enhances everything.
Blows my mind these kinds of greentexts are getting upvoted.