Your org has a SharePoint structure? I'm very envious! At our place we have multiple SharePoint archipelagos and no map.
Let the best arguments win
Unfortunately, it's very hard for citizens to distinguish lies from truth. E.g. the "Children Overboard" scandal - a well timed lie can win an election. At the very least we need honesty in our election materials. Libellous electioneering is dangerous.
Sounds good... Could I ask for the TLDR for those of us who are new here and don't know much about the Lemmy-verse and backend?
Yes, and systems thinking would encourage us to explore why that is: Starting with understanding the patterns, systems and structures, mental models that cause ppl (especially in Aus) to treat Climate Change like a less important problem than the rise of fascism.
"it’s not a priority for the electorate." - it's worth diving deeper here, rather than stopping at this surface level of thinking.
For example:
These are complex issues that need layers of analysis. Systems Thinking is a useful approach, rather than thinking about just the citizens, politicians, and industry in isolation
More about Aus attitudes to climate issues:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-05/australia-attitudes-climate-change-action-morrison-government/11878510--- tps://interactives.lowyinstitute.org/features/australian-attitudes-to-climate-change/
Systems thinking and climate change:
"In the context of climate change, a systems thinking approach refers to understanding and predicting people’s response to the crisis by exploring the factors and vulnerabilities that influence them. It involves simultaneously seeing the overall climate picture and how it intersects with health, gender, livelihoods, and other sectors–this helps achieve a more comprehensive understanding of the issue." https://idronline.org/article/climate-emergency/connecting-the-dots-systems-thinking-for-climate-solutions/
Short online course: https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/using-systems-thinking-to-tackle-the-climate-and-biodiversity-crisis
OK, so how can we create movement in the platforms of the big two parties? Here are some approaches I'm aware of, what do you think?
What else?
I'm confused. I mean, New York Times and Reuters are generalist news outlets. Politico is a politics news and analysis site. In what respect are the public broadcasters not offering what you're looking for? I love The Guardian but I don't see how it's a better match?
BBC News and ABC News and CBC News services (podcasts or read online) are good for general and political & business world news and analysis, including US news. They have news streams, in-depth analysis pieces and a huge range of podcasts.
PBS and NPR have online news streams and podcasts on all of these topics also.
Check out The Conversation, too.
Yep, good to hear the in-laws echoing criticism of Dutton this weekend - because they're appalled he's intending to copy Trump and Musk
The importance of internal public sector roles such as communications is something we need to continue to talk about to people who are worried about governments wasting money. We need to make it apparent to everyone that they are essential for basic, frontline public systems to work effectively. Our schools, hospitals, pollution control, roads... all rely on 'backend' systems and communication between different arms of government.
The major tuberculosis outbreak in Kansas (yes, we're talking the US, not a poverty stricken nation) is becoming a problem because there are no communications between public health departments and agencies - because Trump has halted their funding.
What about the British broadcasting corporation, BBC, Canadian broadcasting corporation CBC Australian broadcasting corporation ABC? Also America's own PBS and NPR are very much in need of support at the moment
Investigate local, community-run radio stations and independent news services, student journalism projects etc in your area as well. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_community_radio_stations_in_the_United_States
I think it's more that it's very easy (and now free) to book a campsite and there's zero incentive for people to cancel bookings they aren't going to use.
Ghost bookings would be a labour intensive way to limit the number of people at campsites (ParkVics would have far easier ways to do that) and Bookings contractor commissions? On free bookings? That wouldn't be very lucrative.