nyctre

I was just answering a question with information I have gathered reading comments around here. Even the way I phrased it didn't really include myself. Not sure why you inferred that I was so angry. If anything, your response is angry.

Harris said that as president, she would maintain the US alliance with Israel and “ensure Israel has the ability to defend itself.”

To most people that sounds like she'll keep sending weapons which will then be used to murder Palestinians.

Main issue for most people is the fact that she's not trying harder to stop Israel from killing Palestinians.

Cause the USA could leave NATO tomorrow and the discussion of NATO vs Russia wouldn't change. So the USA is irrelevant in this conversation. Plus, those were USA/CIA actions, not NATO actions. And NATO isn't ruled by the USA, no matter how much some people around here like insisting.

Movies cannot be saved by one, two or even three good actors. For example, the borderlands movie.

Cause it's whataboutism, not cause it's wrong.

There's literally one extra word they put in there. Remove the "don't" and it'll be fine.

Maybe you're right, dunno. To me they just seem like useful idiots of authoritarian regimes. People that legit believe the shit they're saying. I hope you're right, that'd make the whole thing a bit less sad, imo

Also, do you happen to have some examples? Because the best I've heard so far is people accusing users such as linkerbaan or whatever it was, based on the fact that they appeared to be posting during times that coincided with the east European working hours.

I'm just quoting Wikipedia. Not sure how that's making me a lover of far right think tanks. You're free to edit it and provide sources for it and it'll be changed if it's wrong.

And yes, metrics such as 7/10 people can't afford food. Not metrics such as "the country with only one political party is more democratic than western countries".

Anyway, we're back to square one. Me quoting sources, you dismissing them and not providing anything in return. Typical. Anyway, nobody's gonna read this far down anyway, so I'm out. Or storming off, as you like to put it. Mark another victory in your calendar. xD

Again, it was terrible quality of life before the liberalization which started 30 years ago, because that's why it started, and it's gotten worse, not better since. Stop trying to blame it on the pandemic, it was bad before it as I've already said and you've ignored.

As for the other stuff you've mentioned: Good for them on the LGBTQ and healthcare stuff, that's a great thing, however...

"Human rights in Cuba are under the scrutiny of human rights organizations, which accuse the Cuban government of committing systematic human rights abuses against the Cuban people, including arbitrary imprisonment and unfair trials.International human rights organizations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have drawn attention to the actions of the human rights movement and designated members of it as prisoners of conscience, such as Óscar Elías Biscet. In addition, the International Committee for Democracy in Cuba led by former statesmen Václav Havel of the Czech Republic, José María Aznar of Spain and Patricio Aylwin of Chile was created to support the Cuban dissident movement."

"Press freedom is an ongoing issue in Cuba. The country has ranked low on the Press Freedom Index, a list published by Reporters Without Borders which reflects the degree of freedom that journalists, news organisations, and netizens have in a country. Cuba has been ranked among the index's “least free" countries for a decade."

As someone whose family lived under a similar regime I can tell you one thing: quality of life is more than stats. Stats can be good while real quality of life is shit. Which is what appears to be happening there. Which is what usually(probably always?) happens under authoritarian regimes.

Well? What happened? Thought it was a good example? And not another failure in which the people are suffering while the "president" is a rich fuck?

And for those that aren't aware, this "liberalization" had nothing to do with personal freedoms, it's talking about the economy. And it started 30 years ago. And it's getting worse, not better, despite all that time. Any day now, however...

Ok, I'll spell it out for you, maybe you're just that dense. This is a quote from the link, right below the title. The literal subtitle of the article: "seven out of 10 Cubans have stopped eating breakfast, lunch, or dinner due to lack of money or shortages".

If that's not an explanation, then I'm sorry, maybe we have different definitions for the word. So there you go. My definition of poverty in this case is people not having food to eat.

Again, this was at the top of the article, which you'd have seen if you were interested, which you're obviously not. As we've already established, only pretending to be a "lefty"