ninthant

joined 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

This is an extremely good point. Perhaps I should have addressed this in my ~~rant~~ opinion piece, because it's absolutely true. I've been confused by the Green Party's whiplash and underwhelmed by the federal NDP's muted approach.

I will admit that I have enjoyed seeing Singh getting sharper in his criticism in recent months, and wish we could have seen more of that for the past years. He is saying things that need to be said, and I commend him for that. But I imagine a world where Charlie Angus won in 2017 and that feels like a better world than this one.

I hope out of the ashes of all this we can get someone on the left we deserve too. Call me naive but I have this intangible gut feeling that we will? That if Singh resigns, the current mood is such that we have a chance of getting someone really inspiring to take charge of the left going forward? I sincerely hope we do.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

I'm hopeful that he will be! It will be a difficult time and we really do need the best right now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

I know it sounds like hyperbole but the thought really does make me want to cry, especially as he's ramped up so effectively in recent months.

 

OK this title is a deliberately provocative statement, but I'll explain what I mean.

First of all, "Canada has deserved" does not imply that everyone should support PM Carney in the next election. When I talk about what Canadians deserve in this context, I mean that every political viewpoint deserves a good person to represent it. Not everyone thinks like me, and not everyone has the same objectives and preferences as me, and that's of course completely fine. Encouraged, even. If you're a dedicated lifelong leftist then yes indeed Carney is not the PM that represents your viewpoint and thus you deserve a leader who represents you. (That person's name is Charlie Angus, and the fact that he's stepping down makes me want to cry, but that's a digression).

And then for the second easy objection, obviously yes PM Carney is not a Conservative, he's the leader of the Liberal Party of Canada. Which is why my clickbait title said conservative, not Conservative. Carney does not fit amongst the likes of the reprobates in Canada's Conservative Party, or BC's Conservative Party, or Alberta's MAGA. Sorry if I got you all worked up about that.

But let's combine these ideas. It's great that people have diverse opinions and different preferences. In recent times, the excellent market-based economics of the now-failed "carbon tax" originated from within the CPC, the NDP and the left wing of the LPC brought us Pharmacare and dental care and decriminalized marijuana and much more. Going back a bit further, Paul Martin's stewardship of the economy produced a low national debt to GDP level that still lives on despite the deficits of Harper and Trudeau. These good policy ideas from across the political spectrum help enrich Canada, and they came about from having good people representing them earnestly. But to do this, we need the best people to represent the various viewpoints and perspectives that we share.

However Canada's conservatives have had -- and continue to have -- extremely poor-quality representation amongst their political parties. Let's contrast what the Conservatives bring to the table vs our new Prime Minister.

Mark Carney brings a level head, a combination of highly regarded public service and private sector experience, and a steady hand and plan to move our economy forward in these hard times that demand it. He understands economics and how markets function, and how a lack of competition and perverse incentives have led to a GDP with low levels of productivity. He wants to reallocate public sector resources to deliver more value to Canadians. He is not participating in the bullshit "culture war".

And now to the actual Conservatives we get. The leader of the CPC, Pierre "lil" Poilievre, is a hateful weasel of a man. Some compare him to Donald Trump but he's not even that -- he's what the kids these days call a "simp", a loser and wet paper bag who tries to act tough. PP embraces the culture war on the side of the anti-woke, going out of his way to try to hurt and bully vulnerable people so that he and his followers can feel strong by punching down. He wants to gut and slash services that are essential and beloved by Canadians, following in the footsteps of his American idols who are actively doing this today. PP is full of populist slogans that are full of hot air, and pettily torpedos market-based solutions like the Carbon Tax when it's politically expedient.

But it's not enough to say that PP is a bad guy. Fucking duh, he is. But he's also an incredibly poor-quality representative to the Canadians who have the entirely legitimate viewpoint that Canada needs to focus more on economic strength, to encourage entrepreneurial success, and so forth. The Canadians who have that political viewpoint deserve to have a leader who doesn't take marching orders from Republican talking point memos. Lowercase-C conservatives deserve better.

Frankly it should be an embarrassment to Canada's conservatives that they haven't nominated Carney or someone like him. Because it was always possible for them to do that. Drop the hate and bullying, replace the empty slogans with experience and real plans, drop the MAGA and American propaganda in the trash where it belongs. Lowercase-C conservatives deserve this -- not just for my sake but for their own sake.

As someone who has long held policy preferences that tend towards preferring market-oriented solutions, yet using sensible regulation to guide that invisible hand towards beneficial outcomes for the public, someone who is not full of spite towards vulnerable minorities -- I will enthusiastically support Mark Carney in the upcoming election. And if Carney wins and fails to live up to his promises, then I double-dog-dare the Conservatives to replace PP with someone they -- and we -- actually deserve.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly.

And what pisses me off is the calculation that you implicitly state, that by not reacting now the Democrats know they are "safe" because the ire is pointed somewhere else. It pisses me off because I recognize the same impulses in myself. I didn't think Canada was in danger when the ire was on Mexicans and Haitians and Muslims. Just like they don't see the danger now.

But when the barrel is pointed at you, you see more clearly. We are today, and the cowering Democrats are next. The longer they wait, the harder it will get -- but that's how divide and conquer works. The groups all accept the evils being done to the current group to buy their own safety, and they get picked off one by one.

And as you say -- in Canada we have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to break this cycle here. We see what's coming now, and we won't break.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

You do realize what you're saying, right?

You're saying it would be a tragedy of optics to try to stop a dictator from seizing power. That if democrats do nothing they can avoid being targeted in the short term, while Trump chases after others.

Yes. This specific attitude is what I'm furious about. And I'm going to work my damnedest to stop it happening here in my country.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

I have the utmost sympathy and care for democrats and independents who tried and failed. I can't tell them how to feel, but I'd feel scared and helpless.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 hours ago (6 children)

Republican voters got them elected, Democrats are standing by doing nothing as their country is ruined.

There are no attempts to secede, there are no wide-scale protests or strikes. Their democracy falls while they sit back and fret, laughing along with Jon Stewart and smug in their knowledge they are better that Republicans. For all their much-touted "second amendment" they are idle as a tyrant solidifies power.

I do blame Republican for their actions. But I blame Democrats for their inaction. I'm furious because what I see in them I recognize in myself -- it's a challenge for me to not be complacent and fight for my own country. Because if we coast like they do, we will suffer the same fate.

[–] [email protected] 142 points 7 hours ago (36 children)

You’re goddamn right I’m furious.

And no less furious at the weak-kneed Democrats who do nothing as their own country is ripped from them by a clown. “Oh sorry; we’ll try again in 4 years” they say. Fuck your thoughts and prayers, how about do something. You won’t get a free election in 4 years, dummies.

Oh yeah, I realize you’re super busy and with your sportsball games and your reality TV marathons. Your inaction today will haunt your future.

And no this isn’t a call to action or a cry for help. We’re going to be just fine. You’re the ones who have to live there, and live with yourselves knowing you did nothing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

What can we do with the money instead?

We could create a cross-trained National Corps who would be skilled in guerrilla-style defensive warfare, and also in providing peacetime support to help deal with climate crisis and building out infrastructure. These corps could be deployed domestically and to support our allies in times of their crises.

Or we could build domestic manufacturing to build the types of equipment we need to defend ourselves. With the integrated automotive industry in desperate peril, can we re-tool the facilities and retrain the people to make what we need?

Or we could shore up support with our European and other worldwide allies and buy equipment from them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, Canada has invested money and resources into the F35 project and that money will be wasted if we abandon it.

But let’s not throw good money after bad. In economic terms, the money we’ve spent is called a “sunk cost” - meaning that it’s gone. We shouldn’t consider that lost money when deciding what we need to do in the future.

Our country’s defence does not require astronomically expensive fighter jets. And we certainly cannot rely on a country who is threatening to conquer us to supply us the tools to defend ourselves.

 

We, the undersigned, population of Canada, call upon the Government of Canada to reconsider existing and future military contracts with the United States of America, especially the acquisition of new F-35s.

Petition by Charlie Angus

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

I have been using this since you suggested it and it’s improved my experience here remarkably.

Thanks again.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 hours ago

Yup.

Read the news: they aren’t giving Canadians special treatment any longer. The awful way they’ve treated visitors from the rest of the world for decades is how they treat us now.

They don’t want us there. If you make a mistake they will literally put you in chains and detain you for weeks.

Just don’t go.

 

CBC and other outlets are discussing how the trade war is impacting aluminum cans. This highlights the perverse way we’ve structured our economy and how the trade war — while disruptive and causing short-term harm — will help drive longer term structural improvements.

On first glance it could be seen as unexpected that American levies on Canadian-made aluminium could impact our own beer cans. Pretty weird, right?

But no. We export the raw Canadian aluminum to the US, and then re-import it here. This makes sense for the companies involved— they can take advantage of the abysmal worker and environmental protections in the US and lower tax rates to maximize profit. And Canadians buy the beer anyhow; most (including me) not even knowing that it’s happening.

This system allows Americans and American companies to reap much of the value, despite not actually being strictly necessary. Their “value-add” is entirely from being awful, yet it works because of the structure of international trade.

So this system is really good for the US business interests, but is really bad for Canada. In order to boost our economy we lower the price of our dollar — making us poorer, our imports more expensive— in order to subsidize the exports of raw materials. And many of these raw materials are not renewable — once they are gone they are gone forever.

With the trade war we have a new opportunity. We can process our raw materials here. Yes, it may be a bit more expensive because we have labour laws and make our companies pay taxes and try not to ruin the environment quite as much.

But that’s okay — because the price is going up regardless. Deciding to make this structural change was a difficult pill to swallow because there will be people negatively impacted and this can be bad politics. But an idiot with no understanding of economics made this choice for us— a painful experience but also a blessing in disguise.

So yeah let’s process our own aluminum, our own oil, our own lumber. Process it here; capture the value here for Canadian businesses paying Canadian taxes and hiring skilled Canadian workers.

This will be a difficult period of adjustment, there will be hard times ahead. But someday soon those beer cans will be made in Canada. And on that day, we win.

view more: next ›