neutronbumblebee

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

From the interview: The main takeaway is that humans are special, but so are birds and reptiles. So our brains are amazing, but bird brains are even as amazing. We have neurons other species do not have. But the chicken, even the chicken, they do have neurons that we don't have. So evolution has found so many different ways to generate complex brains, not just only one direct pathway from amphibians to humans. In this case, the tree of intelligence is a tree. It's not just a single branch.

 

Intelligence might be a common evolutionary outcome, considering birds developed high intelligence but took a different path to mammals.

Pigeons, with appropriate training, can discriminate between Picasso and Monet's masterpieces. Ravens can recognize themselves in a mirror. On a Japanese university campus, crows have been known to leave walnuts on a crosswalk and let passing automobiles crack them. Many bird species are very intelligent. However, the "bird brain" frequently receives little respect.

Birds' brains are far more akin to our complicated human organs than previously assumed. For many years, it was thought that the avian brain had restricted function due to the lack of a neocortex. In mammals, the neocortex is the massive, evolutionary recent outer layer of the brain that enables complex cognition and creativity. Yet birds' brain structure at a microscopic level is similar to the neocortex in places, despite its differing shape. While birds and reptiles may not have a neocortex, they do have some of the same neurons. They're just in different places. It turns out that at the cellular level, their brain are structured similarly to the mammalian cortex and doing similar tasks, which explains why many birds exhibit advanced behaviors and talents.

On an evolutionary time scale, high Intelligence may not be particularly unique or unusual. Complex brains and cognitive processes may have developed separately multiple times, as have the circuits and neurons that control them.

See also https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/bird-brains-are-far-more-humanlike-than-once-thought/

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago

Their population is 135,000 as of 2018 according to Wikipedia. Although local populations ie in the Arabian Sea might be at risk having been genetically isolated for up to 70,000 years and in smaller numbers

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Who knew that de-extinction would so easy

 

More evidence for an immune model of dementia onset

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago

Our boy won't talk to humans. He has appointed the girl as his spokescat and will headbutt her till she gets human attention. If she is sleeping elsewhere he gets quite confused how to ask for food. Why can't they just read my ears then??!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Ah that what happens when you Google an article which explanes some historical connection to Plato etc but it then uses that to make a completely unrelated point ie woke is bad. I should have read the whole thing before linking it. Looking at the other articles on the site it is indeed mostly right wing propaganda. A better point is Dawnkin's post about Platonic forms here https://www.edge.org/response-detail/25366 in response to the question what scientific idea should be retired in 2014? He points out essentialism is a problem for accepting evolution, and for so many other things.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

And Plato would have gotten away with it too, if not for those meddling kids and their cladistics. Essentialism has been hugely damaging and is the foundation of most types of Creationism. https://newdiscourses.com/2021/02/essentialism-logical-fallacy-plaguing-us-since-plato/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Indeed, and in addition if your religion is not supported by the facts it's time to revise its assumptions. Religion can deal with new evidence, it's just rather slow compared to say human lifetimes. I suspect thats because the basis of many faiths reasoning is built on philosophy, Christianity in particular. Which is a kind of precursor to experimental science where progress is slow or even circular.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
 

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/one-of-the-great-human-crises-warning-after-microplastics-linked-to-lung-colon-cancer-20241218-p5kz7o.html

It's getting so bad that - according to the World Wildlife Fund - the average person is ingesting up to a credit card's worth of plastic each week. Now a new major scientific review links microplastics to lung and colon cancer.

An interview with the main researcher on ABC radio

https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/radionational-breakfast/microplastics-health-harms/104749826

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Its a nice bit of tech. 73M in construction costs. The 'hat' which is the focal plane instrumentation weighs approximately 10 tonnes. It accommodates 5,000 small computer controlled fiber positioners. The entire focal plane can be reconfigured for the next exposure in less than two minutes while the telescope slews to the next field. The DESI instrument is capable of taking 5,000 simultaneous spectra of different Galaxies

 

The DESI Collaboration (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Energy_Spectroscopic_Instrument) has released results from its first year of observations.

“The complex analysis used nearly 6 million galaxies and quasars and lets researchers see up to 11 billion years into the past. With just one year of data, DESI has made the most precise overall measurement of the growth of structure, surpassing previous efforts that took decades to make.” According to Dragan Huterer, professor at the University of Michigan and co-lead of DESI’s group.

https://web.ub.edu/en/web/actualitat/w/desi-force-gravity - New DESI results on the force of gravity

The analysis upholds general relativity but hints dark energy may vary over time. The result validates our leading model of the universe. It limits theories of modified gravity like MOND, which have been proposed as alternative ways to explain unexpected observations – including the accelerating expansion of our universe attributed to dark energy.

The standard model of cosmology summarizes our current best knowledge of the Universe. This is based on two well-established pillars of physics. Einstein's General Relativity, which regulates gravitation, and the standard model of particle physics, for all other basic interactions. However, it also relies on three key components — Inflation, Dark matter, and Dark energy that are critical for understanding a wide range of evidence, from the Cosmic Microwave Background to the Universe's Large Scale Structure.

The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) measures the effect of dark energy on the universe's expansion. Its completed survey will obtain optical spectra for tens of millions of galaxies and quasars, constructing a 3D map of the nearby universe.

“This is the first time that DESI has looked at the growth of cosmic structure. We’re showing a tremendous new ability to probe modified gravity and improve constraints on dark energy models. And it’s only the tip of the iceberg.”

Additional details on the implications for alternative gravity models in this paper - Ishak et al. (2024), Modified Gravity Constraints from the Full Shape Modeling of Clustering Measurements from DESI 2024 https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.12026

Links to the other original papers are here https://data.desi.lbl.gov/doc/papers/

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Also, for those concerned that Human brains have shrunk over the last thirty thousand years, there is good news: A large-scale study published in March 2024 by researchers at UC Davis Health found human brains have been getting larger over the last few decades. Study participants born in the 1970s had 6.6% larger brain volumes and almost 15% larger brain surface area than those born in the 1930s. This steady increase for people born after the 1930s, is believed to be due to better nutrition. https://health.ucdavis.edu/news/headlines/human-brains-are-getting-larger-that-may-be-good-news-for-dementia-risk/2024/03

 

Discoveries about a young ancestor's teeth may shed light on the upward trend in brain size over millennia.

Other explanations

Bipedalism developed long before bigger brains, and the use of tools was widespread in earlier hominid branches. As a result, these causes have been ruled out as the main driving force in brain evolution, despite being essential preconditions. https://efossils.org/book/bipedalism-vs-brain-size

Preteen teeth

The recent study of the 1.77 Million-year-old remains of an 11 to 12-year-old early homo from the Dmanisi site in Georgia is significant. https://phys.org/news/2024-11-fossil-teeth-childhood-prelude-evolution.html. This study of dental development throws some light on another human oddity, which is our very extended childhoods. The fossil's age places it close to the emergence of larger brains in our ancestors. A useful timeline is found here https://australian.museum/learn/science/human-evolution/larger-brains/

For context that's around this point in Human Evolution

Modern Human life history is distinguished by a prolonged childhood in which mental and somatic development rates diverge. This slow development is crucial for developing high cognitive abilities in our socially complex species.

A slowing childhood in a supportive family and cultural transmission

This individual experienced rapid growth in their first five years, faster than in apes. For example, their wisdom teeth fully emerged at 12 years of age compared to 17-24 today. This rapid growth was unexpected given the age of the fossil and its relationship to modern humans. However, the teeth did have a sequence of growth similar to modern humans. Marcia Ponce de León from the University of Zurich and co-author of the study commented "Milk teeth were used for longer than in the great apes and the children of this early Homo species were dependent on adult support for longer than those of the great apes". She suggests that "This could be the first evolutionary experiment of prolonged childhood".

It is believed that children's development slowed as cultural transmission increased, making the quantity of knowledge conveyed from old to young more crucial. This transmission would have allowed them to make greater use of available resources while developing more sophisticated behaviours, providing them with an evolutionary advantage.

The demands of large brains cause Humans to develop more slowly than our closest animal cousins. Energy directed toward the brain dominates the human body's metabolism early in life, which is possibly one other reason why humans develop at a rate more akin to a reptile than a mammal in early childhood. A five-year-old's brain is a real energy monster. It uses twice as much glucose as a fully grown adult. See https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/08/140825152558.htm

What does this explain?

However, just identifying some of the forces influencing the brain's evolution does not account for the emergence of more recent advances such as symbolic language. https://www.britannica.com/science/human-evolution/Language-culture-and-lifeways-in-the-Pleistocene Nonetheless, the brain's expansion was an essential precursor to the richness of human culture. Even in this early era of human evolution where children needed to mature rapidly, and life expectancy was low, adult care exerted a protective effect.

Additional Info

A variety of circumstances probably influenced brain development, including contributions from diverse hominid lineages with larger brains that were previously lumped into a single smaller smaller-brained species. Ian Tattersall provides a nuanced discussion of brain size and how it relates to humanities tangled origins in this 2023 article: Endocranial volumes and human evolution, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10517302/

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

These are the massive black holes that lurk at the core of most galaxies. Like the one at the center of our own milkyway galaxy. The question remains do they form at the center of baby galaxies or are they the seed which triggers a galaxy to develop and they just grow even larger over time. If early galaxies had massive black holes for their galaxy size, that suggests the last option. Primordial black holes that is ones that were formed in the big bang have been a possibility for a long time. They have been talked about by astronomers since the 1970s. It great that so much is being discovered now. Lots of surprises still coming I suspect. More info on primeval black holes here. https://physicsworld.com/a/concerning-primordial-black-holes/

view more: next ›