lltnskyc

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Hopefully Hungary will stay strong and continue to support Ukrainians, even if it is alone in doing so <3

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I don't use it either, but wikipedia (and common knowledge) suggests they do like censoring everything https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_by_Facebook

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

this is implemented in a way that forces all existing messaging services to implement this or shut down

This is not possible. Anybody can host a messaging service as a tor onion, and there is nothing they can do about it :)

The only way they can make it work is to basically only allow connections to whitelisted services (not even GFW does that).

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

I'm hearing this argument over and over again, yet for some reason no one can explain whether giving up land to an invader is always unacceptable, or are there some exceptions? Maybe it's how long ago the land was taken?
I suspect it's the latter, and this time period is greater than 10 years (because Crimea is still "rightfully Ukrainian", right?), but less than a few hundred years (because all the other invaded territories now "rightfully belong to the invader".
You do understand that almost every piece of land on this planet, that belongs to country A, was conquered from another country B (or from a tribe B if we go long enough into the history, or from family B if go even further, or from some other entity if we go even further)?
Should Poland invade Ukraine to retake Lviv?
Should Finland invade Russia to retake Karelia?
Should Mexico invade USA to retake California?
Should every country in Europe invade every other country in Europe because they all hold some territories that belonged to a different country some time back?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

I'm used to it, thankfully downvotes don't change anything :)

[–] [email protected] -5 points 6 months ago

There’s a legal obligation to provide defense lawyers to defendants and it obviously isnt done by holding lawyers at gunpoint.

Yes, it's covered by the first point of my post.

Force people to pay tax under threat of violence or find some other way to steal money.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Because you can only implement universal healthcare through violence/theft. Doctors need a motivation to work, right? So you either

  • Force people to pay tax under threat of violence or find some other way to steal money.
  • Force doctors to work under threat of violence.
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Reddit felt like a massive echo chamber

Lemmy is a way bigger echo chamber, it's as "no matter who vote blue" as it gets tbh (with very few exceptions).

Where people aren’t pushed away for respectfully voicing their opinion. Is Lemmy the answer?

Nope, it's the opposite if anything.
I'm constantly getting attacked with ad hominem (my favourite one - getting called a fascist) here despite voicing opinions as respectfully as it gets, as well as providing sources for my claims whenever people ask.
Gotta have really thick skin if you are not left-leaning, but if you are - you will feel right at home :)

view more: ‹ prev next ›