klemptor

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Foot panties!! This is now canon, someone call Merriam-Webster!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Nah, gotta go with soks - can't have that redundant k in there!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (9 children)

Helen is wearing socks with sandals. Helen don't give a single phuck.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Why Philly, this city is really stupid the last few years

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Man, I wish I were this clever. 🏅

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hate to think what porn you must be watching

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

In the context of the OOP I think it's obnoxious, but people who baldly objectify women tend to be obnoxious, so I can't say I'm surprised. I wish they'd knock it off.

"Female" is appropriate as an adjective: I need a female hose adaptor or My primary care doctor is female or Female cats don't spray the way male cats do. Off the top of my head, I can't think of any case in which "female" should be used as a noun - except I guess it's common in healthcare and law enforcement (though still grammatically incorrect).

It seems like "woman" is a hard word to use for some people. I'm not sure why. This also gets into the "woman" vs "girl" thing, which in my view is much more demeaning than "female." We're not children for fuck's sake!

I should mention that some women aren't bothered by "female" or "girl," which is completely their prerogative.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Maus is so powerful.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I keep hearing that but I couldn't get through it! It just didn't hold my attention.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At first I was thinking this is a great price for a historically important home in Princeton, and you can actually get land pretty cheap a little bit north in Hunterdon County, but jeez, what would it cost to relocate and update that house?!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Respectfully, no. We don't need more media personalities running for office. It's too much of a popularity contest as it is. Jon Stewart is intelligent and cares deeply about his chosen issues, but that doesn't mean he'd make a good (or willing) president. Tucker Carlson is just a boob.

I want a boring-ass presidential candidate with good solid policies and a willingness to take the long view (as in what's best in the long term for the country, not necessarily what will get them re-elected). I don't care if they're cool or charismatic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
view more: next ›