joeldebruijn

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

My understanding is roughly, for example:

  • Microsoft Word desktop application: not SAAS.
  • Microsoft Word online: SAAS (just like any other service accessible by browser but not a "localhost")
  • Onedrive: SAAS, storage with local explorer integration.
  • Exchange server on prem: not SAAS, increasingly diffucult to do.
  • Exchange server by MS: SAAS
  • Microsoft Outlook Classic for desktop: not SAAS.
  • Microsoft Teams for desktop: SAAS although local install but its just another frontend instead of browser.
  • Office365: SAAS but really a container for every tool in the MS online toolbox together.

Some caveats: Word handles spellchecker in their cloud and clippy 2024 (Copilot) integration blurs the line.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

SAAS isn't about subscription perse although they have them of course. Its about "not needing to take care of". It's software on "someone else's computer" just as with public cloud. In a SAAS construct a provider does the hosting, computing, connection, install, configuration and maintenance. Absolving clients from that burden.

Comparing proprietary desktop applications (even with a subscription) with FOSS alternatives is useful, it's just not SAAS.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I prefer FOSS as much as possible and didn't read all comments on YouTube but ... desktop applications are not SAAS. eg LibreOffice and Adobe apps. But I guess it only requires a different title as the list itself is useful

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I like the way you assign different attributes to friends and family.... 😁 Computer idiots, friends and family or ... Computer idiots friends, and family ....

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

That's what my friend Giskard said. 😁

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

Got this site once stating "passwords can't contain parts of username" icw a 64 character pw.

And usenames like "daneelolivaw" block passwords with

da an ne ee el...

dan ane nee eel ...

dane anee neel.... etc in them

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

I wanted it to work because of its place in the timeline, before everything else and provide more history.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Also I'm very much cautious about them on anything browsing related. Discovered (after others also) they let their search-pages-in-a-shop get indexed.

Meaning I could go to Caterpillar, search for "Wabtec is better" and then this search url (with 0 products) would turn up in Google searches and that URL persisted. Text and all.

Basically one could spray-paint and tag sites with this graffiti. Shop admins didn't even have means to remove it.

Problem ignored and stayed this way for months.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

Loosing vast amounts of historical posts or would I say "cultural heritage" is a shame but I couldn't trust the party hosting it ...

So with Twitter I did the same, 13 years of tweets. Even took a one month payment on a bulk erase / unlike / unfollow / unretweet service to get it done in a reasonable amount of time.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This one time I got this catch22 situation with a service.. Turned out password reset in the Android app accepted 32 characters but in the browser less.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Thanks for this write up, appreciated because sometimes (like on LinkedIn, I know don't ask) it feels like everyone is an AI guru talking hype hype hype.

view more: ‹ prev next ›