fossphi

I hate how true it is. Such a sadness

It wouldn't help with user config issues, though

Consider having just two of them. The one which is active actually seems like a button that demands attention. It's basic design stuff. Tabs denote choices between active viewports, it should be unambiguous always which one is active. These hovering tabs are more like buttons which intuitively ask to be clicked

https://github.com/black7375/Firefox-UI-Fix

Try looking at the comparison screenshots in this repo. Or look up some images of firefox australis. You'll see how tabs are actually behaving like tabs and are denoting clearly which one is active by linking itself naturally to the viewport

Edit: https://github.com/Glitchcode2447/Firefox-Australis-Theme

Chomp!

I think this is a big accessibility issue. Please let tabs be tabs. This design seems too similar to Firefox's new design where it's hard to tell which tab is active (specially if you have only two open). I feel like tabs should be attached to the viewport/content otherwise they look like buttons where my intuition is to click on an active to tab to activate it

4070 ti super

What? There's cards with both ti and super in the name‽

Then ask your bear to make a finger gun

Libera is quite active

A vector is an object which transforms like a vector

But they're also working on sidebar tabs. It's out in nightly already

I think it kicks in when you distribute. For example, let's say I have a fork of some GPL software and I'm maintaining it for myself. I don't need to share the changes if I'm the only one using it.

The point is that people using a software should be able to read and modify (and share) the source when they want to.

IANAL and all that good stuff

For a brief moment, only if it propelled him to outer space