Nice try. But no.
I bet that the amount of singular bills getting passed through both the house and senate that has spent money on helping common citizens is close to nil in the past decade.
There is no scenario in which what you describe is the reasoning for the bill getting voted against, especially by republicans.
You're reasoning feels like gymnastics to make republicans look good as you don't have an easy argument to make.
Actually you don't need to. Mumbai is so expensive that the phrase "1st world prices for 3rd world conditions" applies.
The evidence has been given to you in the form of links to youtube videos. You refusing to click through isn't lack of evidence.
Here's why:
Boards of directors are CEOs of other companies that are buddies of the CEO of the company they are directors of. This is like a shitty musical chair of board of directors.
Funny choice of Mumbai that tickled me... though can't pinpoint why.
It's not quite equivalent right? Using an existing plant is cheaper and faster than building a new one?
Its like saying a datacenter is not financially viable only because top brass decided to use a perfectly good existing one.
You're not on the level of wealth this thread is about so you have nothing to worry about. Besides, your income is already taxed and in some countries it is deducted by the employer before you ever see your salary.
Are you really smart if you need mommy server to function?
Can you list the consequences or are you just giving soundbites?
Hey you know which energy sources also have lots of unsolved issues with waste disposal and pollution? Fossils.
Within the context of this bill, how else can one explain all the NO votes purely from Republicans? What about republicans whose states are devastated by Hurricane Helene?