escapesamsara

All because they survived the US's best attempts to destroy them.

In 1941, following such mistakes that were obviously bad ideas, and following the Nazis ridiculously good use of the media to gain and maintain power, the fairness doctrine was passed in the US. Until Clinton's repeal of the doctrine all media that reported orr discussed politics had to do so with equal weight to all sides of an issue and without bias towards any group.

The media working for politicians or political parties leads to Nazis, every time. Just like liberals compromising or choosing a moderate approach.

Ukraine is not, objectively could not qualify before 2014 when it became good for the US war machine for them to qualify, and most importantly, NATO should've disbanded in 1991 when the sole reason for its existence fell.

Except she didn't campaign in most states, hence her loss in even democrat leaning swing states in the general election.

Media is supposed to be neutral and was until the 90s. Media is not supposed to take any particular side. You're confusing the medias right and responsibility to criticize government with extreme bias against part of government.

As someone that has done agricultural work, it's easier than any job in an Amazon warehouse.

Not really, we should come to our own conclusion regardless of what others say, especially in fields that cannot be solved or even partially explained by science, like politics.