emmeram

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I knew an H Jay.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Your stylization is more correct than mine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I’ve heard people pronounce it as “galli-PO-lease”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I submit: Gallipolis, Ohio.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

The pronunciation of Lebanon you called out may sound like it came from a hayseed, but it’s closer to the way people in the country of Lebanon pronounce it than the mainstream American pronunciation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

You won’t believe where Kanorado is located.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

My first thought went to Spike from Cowboy Bebop.

Now I’m wondering: was Spike based on Bugs?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago (7 children)

That would be the laryngeal nerve. It’s been with us vertebrates for a long time.

I take your, “for zero reason,” to indicate that it’s silly that it’s so long in a giraffe. And it is, because it connects the larynx and the brain, two bits that aren’t very far apart. You’d never design it that way from scratch.

But the laryngeal nerve’s length has a reason: it loops around the heart and it developed in our fish-like ancestors. At that time, it wasn’t silly for the nerve to wrap around the heart, because fish don’t have necks and thus the nerve was about the same length whether it wrapped around the heart or not. As necks developed, evolution found it easier to lengthen the nerve than to reroute it. So here we and giraffes both exist, having much longer laryngeal nerves than you’d engineer if you were making us from scratch.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is true of an enterprise/company union. Industrial unions tip the seesaw to the other side.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

except Noah; wtf was that

I'm going to hazard a response to what you found wtf:

Aronofsky's Noah is told with a Jewish perspective on the story. In Jewish tradition, Noah is a notable person, but he is not admirable. In Genesis it states that Noah was righteous in his generation. Rashi, a leading rabbi in the Middle Ages, said in regards to that statement: "Others, however, explain it to his discredit: in comparison with his own generation he was accounted righteous, but had he lived in the generation of Abraham he would have been accounted as of no importance." (https://www.sefaria.org/Genesis.6.9?lang=bi&aliyot=0&p2=Rashi_on_Genesis.6.9.2&lang2=bi)

Jewish sages, too, have long criticized Noah for accepting God's dictate that he will destroy all life on earth without argument. That's in contrast to Abraham who, when God said he would destroy Sodom and Gomorrah, argued with God and got him to agree not to destroy the cities if there existed ten righteous people in the cities.

So Aronofsky shows Noah as a religious extremist who does what God says without question. It's a sometimes ugly portrayal, but it fits with an interpretation of Noah that sees him as the best the world had on hand, but not the best that mankind can be.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I’ve been using Instapaper for years. It does the job.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I did not expect to see a Dane Cook reference today.

I’m partial to Christ Chex myself.

view more: next ›