dsilverz

joined 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (20 children)

There are cases where Windows messes up with booting, rendering Linux unable to boot. There's even a recent thing involving GRUB that stopped booting up after some Windows update.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

If I know correctly, some satellites have ionic propellers, needing just electricity to function.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

This seems to be a Javascript thing, not a Lemmy thing. IIRC, everything that's pasted triggers the onpaste event with a "image.png" file/blob, regardless of the source format.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Flying by brooms (Bro thel)

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Different organisms react differently to the same chemical substances. There's a study linking ADHD and paradoxical reaction to stimulants:

Many people with ADHD have next to no reaction or react paradoxically to caffeine (coffee/black tea/cola) and other stimulants (nicotine, “Red Bull,” amphetamines).

Source: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3163785/

As I'm writing this reply, I have not yet been able to find any other studies that delve deeper into the matter, but it seems like it's indeed a known phenomena.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This reminds me of a currently trending Brazilian meme (amostradinho) that I'll translate here: "Huh, what audacity! In my presence? I like this way, the lil' exhibitionistic, let me fill your ticket, 'Once upon a day...', and that day is today, it's now!"

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It also doesn't prevent advertisements carried through the website's own domain. For example, lots of video platforms send their advertisements through the same domain as the content's domain, so if you block that domain, you'll also block the possibility of watching any content there. That's why you need to have ad-blocking within the browser.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

There was a similar question at another community. I'll verbatim my reply:

As a syncretic Luciferian currently, I’d say esoteric and occult books/grimoires as well. Everything that’s deemed “demonic” by christianity should be safely archived.

There are many, many authors and books that hold importance for esoteric and occult studies and practices.

An example that comes to mind are the books written by Anton LaVey, especially the The Satanic Bible. As he was american, so are his books’ first copies from, so a greater risk of those copies being seized or something.

While this risk wouldn’t be the same for all corpora written by Aleister Crowley, as he was English so the first copies aren’t at american soil (if I guessed correctly), I’m not sure how far a christotyrannical regime would go for “serving God’s will”.

So, in summary, I’d say everything should be archived. Both physically and digitally. It’s worth mentioning how Internet Archive is being attacked: the Internet Archive holds many digital copies of important esoteric and occult knowledge as well. If Internet Archive goes permanently down, it’d ripple to other sites such as sacred-texts.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As a Brazilian nervously watching the unfolding of a potentially global mess, I bring you the best Brazil can offer: memes! Here's a pretty relatable one (Original cartoon from Maurício de Souza, Turma da Mônica)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Throughout all my jobs, I've been always systematic in not creating any friendship or relationship. That's because I feel like workplace problems could affect the relation, or vice-versa, when personal disagreements could affect the workplace, because the humans involved would the same, me and my coworker. Imagine dating a coworker and then, eventually, falling into some disagreement (every relationship has one), then one of you (you or them) decides it's better to temporarily go apart so to settle things, but you both will need to see each one face to face tomorrow. You'll look in their eyes and you'll find a hard time distinguishing between your love and your coworker, because they're the same person (you still love them). There's also the presence of falsehood within workplaces, people that seems nice until they're at your back conspiring against you, trying to push you to the cliff. I faced lots of falsehood throughout my jobs. Careers sometimes involve competing against others and there are lots of people that takes this competition spirit too far, diminishing your job and your life for them to get some advantage (i.e. a better position within the company, a better wage, or even "for sadistic fun" of seeing others to be fired).

Maybe I'm wrong, but that's how I ever felt about workplace relations, I always tried to keep the workplace restricted to my professional persona. I'll be kind and helpful, but I'll kinda "robotic" to my coworkers and bosses. You could correctly guess that this led me to being a solitary person, something I actually always was, because I'm the typical former nerd colleague back at the high school, the shy, social awkward kind, never had real true friends, and love seems like some extraterrestrial fictional thing to me (not that I'm not capable of feeling love for someone because I once felt, but externalizing it and turning it into a relationship only happened in dreams, I guess).

So, in my opinion, it's not a trustworthy thing to make friends at work, especially if it involves possibilities of higher positions and/or higher wages, or a narcissistic boss that wants to be worshiped. But, as I said, maybe I'm wrong.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I totally relate. There's this thing in introverts, social battery, that is used to deplete quickly.

view more: ‹ prev next ›