unix is about doing one thing and doing it well, which is why systemd, baaad
...what do you mean ditch x11 in favor of wayland? no no, we need to preserve x11, the famous one-thing-well-doer
unix is about doing one thing and doing it well, which is why systemd, baaad
...what do you mean ditch x11 in favor of wayland? no no, we need to preserve x11, the famous one-thing-well-doer
unrelated, but it's so weird to me that red means right wing in the usa
did you understand my question?
enjoy having the best blacklisted drivers on linux then i guess
where does that expected drop come from?
that's disconnected me from the general linux user experience
are we romanticizing having a broken system?
why would they use the gplv3 in the first place? didn't they know it's incompatible with v2?
what i mean by production is "not randomly breaking because it's feature freeze time and now i have to reinstall everything". i assure you it's not a high bar
sorry if i sound a little annoying about this, it's just that i've seen so many people recommending debian testing as if it's just a different flavor of debian for people who want a more up-to-date system and are willing to deal with a little instability, but it is not that. debian testing is made exclusively for testing debian. it is not made for daily driving. i've had so many issues with debian systems in my lab which i later found out were caused by someone "upgrading" the system to testing bc they heard debian testing is the daily driving version and debian stable is just for servers that need 99.9% uptime
honestly, you'd be better off using sid rather than testing, since it's rolling release
as for gimp, they can just use pinning to upgrade gimp exclusively. they can also use backports. no need to upgrade the whole system
never run debian testing for production use
never run debian testing for production use
debian testing is not fit for production use
lmao