Roman Republic wasn't a democracy. It was ruled by aristocratic families. Lol.
blade_barrier
It's the main criterion. If the system doesn't last, then it's shit regardless of what it is. The main purpose of the government (and any organization, for that matter) is to exist for as long as possible, everything else comes second. I wonder what other criteria do you have in mind?
The Khmer Rouge was never socialist
They weren't socialist bc they took a step past socialism and into communism directly. They abolished money, replaced army with armed militia, achieved direct democracy, abolished institution of family, replaced farmers with agrarian proletariat, achieved 100% public housing. USSR is a capitalist shithole compared to Democratic Kampuchea.
I'm not a communist bro.
Dunno. Dropping friends due to politics seems totally cringe. Civilized people should have the option of "let's not talk about politics" instead of breaking up relationships.
Easy: democracies don't last long compared to the other forms government. So they can't be better than other forms of government.
What's the longest lifespan of a democratic state in human history? Now compare it to the average lifespan of monarchies, for example.
-
Yes. Obviously.
-
No. Both are shit.
-
No.
Democracy and dictatorship is not a dichotomy.
There is no practical alternative to this
An alternative would be to stop trying to overthrow some classes and touch grass
I live in a post soviet country so I experience the impact of socialism to this very day. It's appalling.