aoidenpa

joined 1 year ago
[โ€“] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

And you are stuck in that thought forever.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I blocked a lot of communities.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I imagine it like this: First we do the useful stuff as much as we can. But at some point it slows down and halts. Then with that knowledge doing useless stuff is easier. So we widen the search. Maybe most of them are really useless but few that can make a breakthrough is enough. Now back to useful stuff. This process is not discrete of course it's more dynamic and fluid. Does this make sense?

[โ€“] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

This is soo me! Declining the call would pull more attention. I play dead.

[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

Heey I got that it's the beatles thing.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

What is the worst could happen if I click on a random link on a brand new computer?

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Ein zwei drei. Rammstein.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

That's not how it's defined. 0.99.. is the limit of a sequence and it is precisely 1. 0.99.. is the summation of infinite number of numbers and we don't know how to do that if it isn't defined. (0.9 + 0.09 + 0.009...) It is defined by the limit of the partial sums, 0.9, 0.99, 0.999... The limit of this sequence is 1. Sorry if this came out rude. It is more of a general comment.

[โ€“] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Don't forget Gorgonzola Larson.

view more: next โ€บ