What nuance is there be had about this? Israel is a settler-colonial apartheid state that deserves what should've happened to America when those settlers were doing it. That's like saying "the civil rights conflict has an infinite list of wrinkles and nuances"; in that it's objectively wrong.
absentthereaper
joined 2 years ago
The western "left" are nine of ten settler-descent. I genuinely don't know why we expect anything of them but the most ghoulish takes that don't belong to self-avowed democrats.
Fuck the police
Yeah, I'm just not having them. Whatsoever. They won't let me get snipped yet because "oh you're still so young, you'll change your mind later" but uh. I'm just sayn right now, if someone gets knocked up off me because they won't let me snip myself and the rubber fails, the other better be down with aborting. I'm not trying to raise a kid in this era, especially not when they stop being your kids around the age of six and seven. Once their peers get into their head at the school you have no visibility into, anything you tried to teach them goes straight out the window, and I've been watching it happen with ALL of my in-law's kids.
You mean to tell me that wasn't just a false-flag bit the incels were perpetuating? Those are fuckin real?
Could be the rarer-in-comparison potential for some women to paradoxically demand toxic behaviors out of men in their relationships, or worse(which I have personal experience with), women performing the same kind of lack-of-consent, 'if you don't want to fuck you're less of a man/a b[redacted]/a f[redacted], this that and the third' flavor nonsense-- F.D. Signifier has spoke on this a little, but always clarified that it is way rarer than the male-spurred exercise of toxic masculinity; so I rly don't know how much bearing this notion of "women toxic masculinity"(sic) has on the issue.
Either way, I consider it an issue less pertinent to politics and more to interpersonal dynamics, which all those factors are FUBAR right now mostly because a still-substantial percentage of men aren't willing to work on themselves in ways to actively dismantle the toxic paradigms they're living with.
Crackers and hypocrisy, name a more iconic duo
Fine; consider it let go of then.
Is that supposed to change anything? I'm physically trying not to pop off right now if only because I recognize your username-- but keeping it a buck? This kind of immediate-defensive, "well I never owned slaves" line, coupled with how quick you peddled it out, leads me to not believe you for a single motherfuckin second; because it sounds just like every other cracker in this godforsaken nation who can have their lineage traced back to slave owners.
You're patently untrustworthy, manifestly unserious, and honestly probably fucking dangerous regarding matters of liberation if you prioritize your papier-maché ego over the lived experience and frank fucking torture that leading a Black life entails; regardless of whether or not your hands or those of your ancestors were washed in that historical fountain of blood. I'd bet my left eye they didn't get involved back then either, the same way your words imply you won't get involved. After all, your folk 'never owned slaves', so it's not your problem in your purview.
tl;dr please, for once in your life, perform some honest self-crit.
view more: next ›
From the river to the sea