Smith6826

joined 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I'll go ahead and assume you didn't see the comment I'm referring to, that these 2 apparentlty pro-fascists are angry about and attacking me for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I see you commented elsewhere since I replied, so I'll as again:

"All i did was denounce genocide and fascism.

So what you're telling the world is you're a pro-fascist, genocide appologist?"

Since you said you think the problem is the user arguing against genocide and fascism, instead of the fascists who censor anti-fascist comments and ban even the most civilized voices of dissent.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

All i did was denounce genocide and fascism.

So what you're telling the world is you're a pro-fascist, genocide appologist?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I have looked at the lemmy.world mod log for both accounts.

I posted the entire thing for everyone to see. There is no "gotcha", just exposing fraudulent .world mods and admins.

The mod asked you what you meant by controlled opposition twice, they did give you warnings.

This is 100% irrelevant to any rules they claimed i broke, and is showing your fascist leanings for taking the side of the fascist instead of question why that would be grounds for a ban in the first place. Lmao speaking about controlled opposition infiltrators... And NO THAT WASN'T A WARNING, SINCE IT DIDNT BREAK ANY RULES.

You also called everyone who downvoted your comment fascist

I strongly suggested everyone who downvoted my anti-fascist, anti-zionist, anti-genocide comment, was probably one of the categories I was arguing against, and I stand by it. Wtf are you doing in a leftist community RandomVideos? Rhetorical. No true left wingers would be speaking like you are right now.

they also made no pro-fascist arguments as far as i saw(please correct me if im wrong)

They 100% did by accusing my comment of being propaganda.

If you didn't out yourself already by asking "I've never seen fascist mods banning people for nonsense, can you pwetty pwease give me an example?", then you absolutely have now.

Pathetic. And exactly what I'm talking about when saying controlled opposition. Fascist/Zionist infiltrators claiming to be the same as the majority of the group, but then poisoning it with with fascist/zionist ideology and arguments, with the goal of having one of them placed as moderator to have total control over speech, narrative, censorship, banishment.

The fact that you agree with fascists that mildly suggesting they are controlled opposition for accusimg the facts i posted as "propaganda" was worth being banned, AND THAT YOU READ THOSE FACTS YOURSELF AND HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THEM, says everything about you that actual left wingers need to know.

Typical low IQ fascists keep proving me right. Now give your handler a refund for your poor performance.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

You can downvote me and science, but wake me up if you come up with a real argument disputing the entire field of endocrinology, molecular biology, and the rest of biology by extension. Not to mention archeology and anthropology.

At the very simplest way to understand, you do know the difference between testosterone and estrogen, and their biological mechanisms, correct? Rhetorical.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

It's echo-chamber, culture-war nonsense. There's a reason men are the vast majority of physical jobs, and it's not because anyone is stopping qualified women from working.

Just as an example, in my personal experience, we rarely received women's applications to work warehouse or roofing, and even less who met the qualifications of being able to pick up minimum 50lbs (not that heavy, approximately 2x 24's of beer) on their own.

I'd also like to point out that, while I'm not trying to minimize her impressive achievements, your friend is from modern society, not ancient. She had the privilege of going to school, being a cheerleader and having free time, instead of cranking out babies in the ancient wilderness.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Tasks based on sex were not so prevalent until high cultures formed...

Like being pregnant and giving birth (as many times as possible), breastfeeding, and raising those same infants while the men are doing tasks that are unfeasible for pregnant breastfeeding women taking care of infants?, like hunting, building shelters and going to war, among other things? (Which some women did, but the majority did not)

Oh, ya ya, for sure. A lot of people in this thread seem to be sharing the same anti-anthropology delusion. Which is very concerning but not surprising in the age of misinformation. More culture-war BS.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Whether that hairless ape was a man or woman also didn't matter.

Yep, and we can all look at verifiable evidence like professional sports and Olympic records to show.....oh, wait a second...

Ok let's forget that indisputable evidence for a sec...We can look at scientific analysis of dug up remains to see what their body types and structures were like an..d...uh.... Huh.

Ok denying all that open-shut evidence, let's study endocrinology and loo...fuck.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Did women also hunt? Yes.

"As much as men"?

No, beyond any shadow of doubt. Stop trying to white wash over history and verifiable evidence to try and push your personal agenda of stoking culture-wars.

Unless we're talking about tribes where the men took care of the children, the above statement is exaggerated at best and borders on anti-history/anti-anthropology nonsense at worst.

You might as well post that the men spent as much time taking care of the children than the women. And if you can admit that is false for the majority of human history, then you can clearly see how this being false also disqualifies the "women spent as much time hunting" statement.

Again, there is no debate on the fact that many women were great hunters and not just gatherers, but you also can't deny that most of the women took care of the kids.

Looks like I took the bait, didn't I...smh lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (18 children)

This is widespread and has been ongoing for almost a decade now, when reddit started turning hard towards fascism and censorship. Just like reddit, some of the larger communities here have been infiltrated and ran by controlled opposition fascists.

In fact, the reason the last mod gave for banning me from PoliticalMemes without a warning was suggesting they were controlled opposition, since they were making very pro-fascist arguments, but trying (and failing) to portray themselves as left wing.

Check out my first few comments on this account for a direct example of .world admins and mods on PoliticalMemes in this case, banning for "calling people fascist". First immediate ban from the community without warning, then they pushed for an instance-wide ban that .world admins gladly obliged.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Wait, so this isn't real? Everything's so goddamn crazy I can't tell anymore.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Interesting. How would they know if you won with money you picked up and not your own?

view more: ‹ prev next ›