It's not so much that it's only the "I can't in good conscience vote for this party, so it's better that the objectively worse party wins" crowd is worse then "I want the fascist to win" crowd. It's the first crowd might listen, while the second is a lost cause.
Resand
joined 1 year ago
The issue is, there's not many places in the world that won't be affected :(
and 12% not sure aka couldn't really make up their mind if Hitler was bad or not... so ads up to 24%
Sure, but there's also half of your countrymen to think about
Honestly at this point, in a 1 on 1 war between south and north, I'd wager on South. Will still suck super bad tho
It’s a gender election. It really is.
Is it tho? About 40% of GOP voters are women. Sure it's not 50%, but still much larger percentage than you'd think if it was a "war of the sexes" thing
No no no, that's simply wrong.
US healthcare system is the best in the world, at doing what it's designed to do. Issue here is that they're measuring it on care provide vs cost, while the US system is optimized for profits.
If they instead ranked the results by which system generated the most private profits the US would be first.
A lot of that is because rest of NATO is under US umbrella. Not like nukes are high tech at this point. Most of Europe could get nukes real fast if they wanted, but everyone has been better served by it being to many Nuclear Powers up to this point