Rekorse

Okay now justify the cost it took to create the tool.

But look at that giant mountain in the graph! Its beautiful! Like the rockies or...another mountain I definitely know the name of! Uhhh Bahamas! I think thats one...

Anyways I like pretty graph!

They didnt reject her because she's a woman. She was a bad candidate, just like Hilary. Bad performance, whether thats on her or her team who knows. Noones going to vote for someone purely because they think its fun to have a woman in the white house. Thats extremely low on peoples list of concerns for presidency.

Nobody operates on facts alone. Unless you were there when it happened, you have to trust a source to some degree.

Quite a lot of people just say fuck it, if its all varying degrees of shit, I'm not going to listen to any of it.

Thats how word of mouth type stuff ends up on fox news, because even they know a lot of right wing Americans wont trust professional news stories over their neighbors anecdotes.

We might think we use better sources, and check into things more vigorously, but our conclusions still require faith as much as any republicans beliefs.

We still haven't even figured out how to refute religion conclusively, for example. Juries still out on whether religion is fantasy or actual reality, whether we think thats ridiculous or not.

Fact based knowledge sounds good but could mean anything.

There is also semiautomatic modes which allow you to specify part of that triad without needing to exactly know how best to adjust all three.

I figure it depends mostly how much time you have to take your shot. Though im not sure how fast someone can get with manual mode with practice.

People who are in an excited emotional state just aren't going to do well thinking that stuff through.

I'm not immune to it either, I just dont have tiktok or facebook at all to avoid it.

Was sarcasm my bro.

Maybe maybe not.

Okay if its about men who say that, why are the news articles about boys saying it.

And no this isnt rape. Rape is rape. Shit talk is shit talk or whatever you want to call it.

The point I'm making is that people shouldnt assume a story has merit simply because its being written about in a news paper. They aren't choosing stories based on merit, they are picking them based on revenue.

Its telling that most of the stories leave out Nick Fuentes name, or else people wouldnt click it because they know thats his schtick to begin with.

Good one.

You must be one of the good americans then, bravo!