Just a guess, but no? Insults are subjective I suppose and not being able to 'insult' a country or it's people would make many discussions impossible I think.
Name
joined 1 year ago
The difference is that one belief is evidence-based, and hence a fact, while the other isn't
You don't have a link to it by chance? Would be interesting to read
Maybe not a moron, but sad. I dunno why he acts like some rethorical genius when he just evades all points people make him and instead makes up his own strawmen to argue against.
Which makes it a fact? Facts can change too
Read what I wrote again, you're close to grasping it :)
To clear things up for you, you stated that laws had nothing to do with morality, and that is false as previously seen.
But I do agree that laws might not be a source of morality, even if some laws aim to alter how people view certain matters.
Ethics, mainly