Grimble

joined 4 years ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

British boy look out... Your swag is too different... your posts are too fire...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Came here just to get ridiculed so you could call us out for the ridicule. LOL typical

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wanna make this guy dance

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah i bet they want the war to end

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Why would you defend a guy who ordered deaths alongside Lenin then immediately left and cozied up to 1920s American fascism to make books about "The Betrayed Revolution" because he didnt get his share?

Trotsky was a socialist. After his defection, he did next to nothing to advance socialism, only to passively denounce the closest thing the world had then to a Socialist Order. And he did this by going to their enemies, objectively the least socialist-tolerant bloc on Earth. Archetypal example of a self-centered "leftist" who folds inward and exclusively talks about their own life/'persecution' after one falling-out with the organized left. Look at Trotskyists nowadays and tell me they aren't walking parodies who talk like Broadway characters. It says a lot abt how off-kilter you have to be to throw yourself behind Trotsky's weirdo 'cause'

EDIT: To be clear, while I havent seen much of his work, I respect parts of his legacy. I'm sure there's a lot of insight in his writing - reading criticism from a seasoned former Bolshevik is interesting, and the perspective is useful for making sense of the wider movement. I also understand he was under a lot of personal pressure at the time he fled the USSR. Despite any merit Stalin showed in WW2 or the Union's massive industrialization effort, it must've seemed unfair to many party members that he was chosen to succeed Lenin (not sure of specifics on that event). I'd even say his assassination wasn't necessary, and the graphic details aren't something I take pride in. However, at the end of the day Trotsky's decision to defect was a net negative for socialism in the early 20th century. He should've tried to be a different kind of conscientious objector, not a voice of anti-Soviet dissent.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

If you want the end of capitalism you'll support whatever it realistically takes to dismantle it. And that won't exactly be an "open" or "transparent" process while it happens. Simply put, the collective force that replaces capitalism will have to coerce certain people into accepting the change, if nothing else but for the safety of that new administration (IE avoiding rightwing takeovers, legit sabotage, hatecrimes etc).

Just remember that about anticapitalism - whatever form it takes, it's no dinner party. Even after a revolution, certain people try to resist things they have no material reason to oppose. Those people are reactionary - directionless, even dangerous unless they're re-educated or have privileges restricted.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Do you want the end of capitalism yes or no

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Youve gotta be shitting me

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do they make redditors in a factory or something

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Fuck anyone who works for the Dept of Naval Intelligence or the FBI. Fuck their social media interns, even. Anyone who interferes with the internet to filter out left-wing political content is scum.

If that offends you more than "fuck tankies," you have the same problem but worse.

You're a human or a fed. Are we on the same page? If not, that'd be odd, since this is just a trans-friendly forum for harmless shitposting, right? There shouldn't be any feds here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

use your words

view more: next ›