Egon

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

There sure are a lot of Lemmy bro-gaders and NATO shillbots in this thread. That's the only explanation for people disagreeing with me.
smuglord

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

America had a larger infection rate and mortality rate than North Korea.

I know what you're gonna say "oh they lied about their numbers". Why would I trust the US to be honest about theirs? Why would I trust the US media in their claims about North Korea lying about its numbers?
The US had several whistleblowers like Rebekah Jones getting arrested/abused/harrased for their reporting on the state of the US obfuscating data.
The american media has been shown to lie time and again, especially when it comes to foreign matters - Most famously about Iraq. What reason do I have to trust it?
The United States has the largest prisoner population in the world and has a history of persecuting minorites and political dissidents like leaders of black lives matter. These dissidents are dissapeared at secret police blacksites where they are tortured. This prisoner population is used as slave labour, which is still legal.
Why would I trust the lies peddled by this authoritarian regime about a country whose population they relentlessly bombed until they'd murdered 20% of it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They literally quoted you...

The restrictions for leaving and entering have not been imposed on them externally, this attitude of Korea predates even the Roman empire

This is you saying the thing you said you didn't say.

I did give sources. Many sources, ones that weren’t Wikipedia.

"Giving sources" isn't just mentioning them. If that's the case then I can back up the other user by saying they have their data from Reuters, the UN, the CIA, CNN, AP, internal military documents made available by FOIA, BBC, MSNBC, NPR, etc.
"Providing a source" means you give a reference to a specific text which supports the claim you're making - in other words it's it's linking to them, providing them as references. You've only done this for the aforementioned ancient history and three christian dudes.

Listen to Blowback season 3, it would do you some good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

"Quiet quitting" is a term made up my small business tyrants in the United States to describe workers doing their job as it is described on the contract, and not going "above and beyond". They somehow believe they're owed more than they pay for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You complained about homeless people you weasely little liar. Go cry about it on /pol/ or go back to reddit

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They simplified it so it would be comprehensible for you, you dolt. They even wrote that at the beginning. If you really wanna get into the math, just read Das Kapital. Here's a brief excerpt speaking about the price of linen

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You didn't engage with their argument, but good try nonetheless. It's nice to see you cling to a fallacy rather than engage in good-faith discussion of an argument clearly illustrated for you to relate to.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If your sarcasm needs an /s it's shit sarcasm and you've got terrible timing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Also you should really do the same

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can't unfortunately. Putin doesn't allow me to use google while I spread disinformatsiya sadness

view more: ‹ prev next ›