Seems like we never learn as a country. People get rich quick off this shit. Dunno why we keep feeding into it. Here I am feeding into it by commenting, so I guess I'm also culpable...
Darrell_Winfield
This is my third time coming across this topic today. I was waiting for additional information, but I wonder if there is any history there. Maybe the sheriff has been feuding with the family for a while and wanted to use this as an opportunity to exert dominance. Maybe they suspect the kid has truly been causing trouble and so are using this as an opportunity to track the kid and see.
Overall, seems like an overreaction, especially in small town USA.
Real question. If Trump goes to prison, does Vance take over at president? If so, would Trump be eligible for another since he only served one term due to this?
You're a lot closer than you'd think. In another comment, they say their oldest is not yet a teenager.
Gotta be a rough household to live in.
Sounds kinda like "your body my choice" is you ask me, not letting other people reproduce.
Here's to hoping it's a typo of "don't have children with them", but that's a hell of a typo.
This is inherently political, but I think the overall intention of the article is to highlight one of the larger media pushes against Trump, and one of Biden's campaign promises, and the hypocrisy therein of his escalation of this.
I enjoyed watching that when it was first created! Any word of a 1080p for that one? I'd even take a release of the timestamps so that I could make the edit to my 1080p versions.
Massive non sequitur there. Taliban does not have military bases on US soil to fortify with 100 personnel.
I'm not disagreeing that the US is assisting in genocide. Has been for a while, and the top two projected candidates for US presidency will further perpetuate this.
But this 100 troop movement is insignificant and is being played up for drama and clicks.
First off, as with every time domestic terrorism is discussed, US armed forces cannot carry out hostilities on domestic soil.
Second off, it's 100 personnel. Barely a blip on the total number of deployable personnel, and it's an air defense group without offensive capabilities.
Clickbait is clickbait.
Reading through this discussion and considering my own daily life, I find that indeed my utilization of smartphones is limited to primarily other existing advances in technology not directly associated with phones. Primarily Internet. In fact, I might be a bit abnormal because my 8 hours at work, my phone is not directly on my person and rarely used. I do, however, need to utilize it for 2FA authentication ~1-2 times per day. Which, digital personal keys were a thing before phones.
So yeah, I'd say that smartphones aren't a big advancement, but the combination of multiple other technological advancements.
Really interested in this. Care to elaborate or share any sources on the matter?