Burstar

joined 11 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

I call BS. Calling for war crimes violates R1 and gets dealt with. If you see it report it.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/32553642

The U.S. will send Ukraine the full $6 billion in outstanding military aid before President-elect Donald Trump is inaugurated on Jan. 20, Deputy Pentagon Press Secretary Sabrina Singh said at a briefing on Nov. 7.

Previously, Politico reported that U.S. President Joe Biden was rushing to deliver the remaining $6 billion by the end of his term out of fear that a Trump administration might halt weapons shipments to Ukraine.

Ukraine will receive $4 billion under the Presidential Drawdown Authority (PDA), which pulls weapons from U.S. stocks, and $2 billion from the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI), Singh told reporters.

MBFC
Archive

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

the proposed “flag the whole Ukraine community NSFW” approach has.

To be clear, I was not proposing keeping this community flagged NSFW permanently. That was a quick, naive solution I temporarily implemented not realizing how much of an effect it would have. I'm really asking 'what content should be required to have a NSFW flag?', and unless you have additional concerns we've settled on flagging combat videos that show the people involved (see pinned post / sidebar).

 

In consideration of those who use UI's that autoplay videos, and that posts would show up in /All, the rules for posts containing combat footage have been changed:

From now on, any new post containing combat footage should have "[Combat]" in its title. If any of the footage contains visible humans in combat, alive, injured, or otherwise, then the post must have the NSFW flag checkmarked.

As always, extreme violence, and gore are still prohibited.

Thank you for your understanding.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

@[email protected] this will probably affect you most. Thoughts?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

All combat footage should probably be flagged nsfw,

I think that is too aggressive. There is all kinds of footage that is clearly safe (eg: drone on drone).

I'm thinking a rule requiring NSFW for combat footage where bodies (living or otherwise) are visible.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I'm being objective. It is an assumption either way as there is no concrete evidence visible in the video. Do you think every drone cam that cuts to static should be flagged as NSFW?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (9 children)

What they 'think' was the last moments. The follow-up drone shows no body, or even blood, so it is likely they got away.

 

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]

I've been getting complaints about footage that is technically non-violent but leaves enough to the imagination that it apparently bothers people, so I wanted to get input regarding where the NSFW line should be drawn.

The video posted here is a perfect example of where I think the limit is. The only complaint I can see is the discharge of a firearm. Does that count? Is 'being able to put 2 and 2 together to know what happened' enough to warrant flagging as NSFW? Was the previous status quo good enough?

Setting aside the obvious "I know it when I see it", please share your thoughts.

Until a better consensus of where the line should be for the community I will leave it temporarily flagged as NSFW.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The community is fine. I was getting complaints that (what I thought was benign) drone footage was NSFW and autoplaying in /All.

I'm going to discuss with other mods about setting a NSFW guideline and where we should draw the line because I think the NSFW community flag is too penalizing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I changed the community to NSFW because people were complaining that drone footage cutting to static was NSFW and displaying in 'All'.

Edit: To be clear I do not think this is NSFW and would gladly revert to not-NSFW if admins and community don't care about the inevitable complaints.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

FTR it is an obvious typo: the correct year is 1895

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

I wonder if they’ll at least be paid in bitcoin?

 

Recently, we spoke about the state of Russia's economy after more than two and a half years of war. It was characterised by strong growth but also signs of overheating, as the economy ran at or beyond capacity.

Today, I want to cover the other side, and look at how Ukraine's is holding on after extensive Russian pressure. I'll look at headline economic indicators, the budget, defence production, and the impact of attacks on Ukraine's energy grid.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/28897886

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has firmly stated that Ukraine should be allowed to conduct long-range strikes inside Russian territory, despite threats from Moscow.

This stance comes in the wake of Ukrainian forces occupying parts of Russian territory for the first time since World War II, and Ukrainian officialls asking Western partners to remove restrictions on the use of Western long-range weapons so that Ukraine can degrade Russia’s logistics and airfields in the rear and bring the war to an end faster.

“Canada fully supports Ukraine using long-range weaponry to prevent and interdict Russia’s continued ability to degrade Ukrainian civilians and infrastructure, and mostly to kill innocent civilians in their unjust war,” Trudeau declared at a news conference in Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec.

MBFC

view more: next ›