Aufgehtsabgehts

joined 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Also nuclear waste doesn't have to be a problem. If anyone was willing to cover the cost of burning it in a breeder reactor for power or burry it forever. It just is because it's expensive.

But it is a problem. Finding a place that can contain radioactive waste for millions of years is incredible difficult. If you read up on it, you get disillusioned pretty fast.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Isn't the movie Hancock a bit in this direction?

[–] [email protected] 128 points 1 month ago

I like to think that he forgets, keeps trying and then makes a new post about it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Then you can use jesus to convert the water component again and repeat the process.

I have a cheap knock off jesus from Alibaba and even he can turn wine into winier wine, if you tell him that it's just red water. Maybe you are using your jesus wrong?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nice. I felt the same way a few years ago and changed everything over 2 years. Best decision ever (besides having a child, that was a great decision as well.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Can't get any more GNU/Linux than that, nice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I started with 30, so not far off. My first step was to try to daily drive Linux. Best decision ever, working with a computer suddenly was fun and exciting again.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It is safer in the sense that, when you selfhost, you have to take care of your own backups. You have to make sure your data is still there, even if two hard drives fail, or your house catches fire and your server burns down. Hertzner is doing that for you.

But you are right of course, from a privacy standpoint it would be much better to have your data on your own server and only send encrypted backups to a remote server like Hertzner.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Here is how I (noobinoob) built my own Nextcloud-Server

  • Hardware: I took the old PC from my aunt, no idea about the specs. Added 4 x 8 TB NAS HDD drives and removed the graphics card, the onboard graphic from the CPU was enough. No raid-controller, just connected the hard drives to the motherboard. In future I can add a PCI-Card with more SATA-ports.

  • Software: I installed Linux Debian, put my 4 HDD drives in a btrfs-raid1 pool, encrypted them with LUCS, installed dropbear to ssh into my server when it is not started and unlocked yet, installed ddclient to update my domain with my home-IP and followed most (not all) of this guide to install nextcloud. Unfortunately, it is in german, but there are plenty of english intructions out there.

  • internet-stuff: I bought a domain (10 Euro/year) and set up DynDNS. I opened the neccessary ports on my router/firewall.

I had to look up a lot of things and failed many many times, but now it works and I am very happy with it - no downtime in the last year. It took about 6-12 months to get there.

In conclusion: Your way (nextcloud on hetzner) is the much better way. You save time and money and your data is more secure.

But if you want to learn a lot of new stuff, building your own server is fun.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It would be easy to unlock the devices for different Software - like ugreen does.

And imagine all the possible backdoors in their software. No one can check, because it is closed source. And this on a device with your most senisble data.

Calling their acting 'responsible' is a huuuge strech.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (12 children)

I sold my Synology NAS as soon as I found out, that I can't change the underlying software (DiskStationManager). It wasn't open source and the hardware was dependent on that propriatary software. As soon as they decide, that your device is too old, they drop support and you are left with an unsecure brick.

And you are saying the software is open source. Did I miss something? Did something change?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That sounds really interesting, thank you for explaining. The last firework I tried to capture was horrible, just as you described, the static light sources blew out. Does this technique have a name I can look up? Maybe my camera has this function as well and I haven't found it yet.

And thanks for the tip with my language settings, I tried to adjust them.

view more: next ›