ApfelstrudelWAKASAGI

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's a really cool car

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

In Italy, it is considered to be a sign of great respect to receive the esteemed family hand pasta and a symbol that one has been accepted by the tribe. It is said that, despite his open mindedness, JFK was a bit taken aback by the gesture, though that may also be because on this occasion he was absolutely zonked.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago
  1. They really aren't. German and Austrian national subs (de and austria) are mostly pro migration (there's definitely an anti-migration camp but it's nothing near the deluge of racism of r/europe) and I haven't ever seen a post/comment there upvoted that could be considered pro AfD/FPÖ. The amount of faschos on r/europe is just insane compared to most national subs.
 
 
1
Rule (feddit.de)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
0
Who would win? (feddit.de)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
 
 
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

There's no need to squint I told you it's just a regular mountain :)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Idk which moral system you operate under, but I'm concerned with minimising human suffering. That implies hitting kill because chances of a mass murderer are too high not to. You also don't follow traffic laws to a t, but exercise caution because you don't really care whose fault it ends up being, you want to avoid bad outcomes (in this case the extinction of humankind).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why do you care whose fault it is? You'd want to minimise human deaths, not win a blame game.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It does create the funny paradox where, up to a certain point, a rational utilitarian would choose to kill and a rational mass murderer trying to maximise deaths would choose to double it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

You would need a crazy low probability of a lunatic or a mass murderer being down the line to justify not to kill one person

Edit: Sum(2^n (1-p)^(n-1) p) ~ Sum(2^n p) for p small. So you'd need a p= (2×2^32 -2) ~ 1/(8 billion) chance of catching a psycho for expected values to be equal. I.e. there is only a single person tops who would decide to kill all on earth.

view more: ‹ prev next ›