this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
1097 points (97.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

9933 readers
400 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 6) 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago (9 children)

Just out of curiosity, does anyone know the average fare of getting from NJ to NYC by train?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago

You need longitudinal data to make any clear conclusions. Market actors will compensate in other areas to adjust to an increased cost. This immediate change is evidence of a transitory shock to the space and nothing more.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

What's the situation in NYC with regards to the Return to Office bullshit? Surely this development will give clear heads another logical argument for continued working from home, right?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Does anyone have a good before screenshot of the same map view / area? I want to stitch together a before shot before I share so that people not from the area can get an idea of the change and not just immediately think "oh well my small town has traffic and it looks like that so what's the big deal"

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago (8 children)

not exactly but with Google Maps you can setup a route with a start time set in the past and look at the congestion at that moment:

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 days ago

We've been seeing a lot of anecdotal posting on Xitter of people who were skeptics or in opposition to this suddenly realizing that they just gained an hour or more per day because the traffic has been significantly reduced. So even some regular people (i.e. not the wealthy) who have to drive in NYC because of their job are realizing that there's a cost benefit even if they do pay for the congestion pricing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Is this the least full Times Square has been after COVID? Cam

[–] [email protected] 319 points 6 days ago (57 children)

Congestion pricing is such a good idea everywhere there is rock solid public transit alternatives. Where there's not, it just becomes a tax on the poor.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 6 days ago (7 children)

bicycles are good too, though maybe not for the longer distances that you would put congestion taxes on

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (56 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Hilarious, a move that was proven to work in Istanbul was avoided... Because..?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Widening roads makes money and adds more cars that also makes more money. If you fix the problem, how are you gonna keep milking it?

Your silly trains, busses and bikes aren't going to pay for the yacht.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I REALLY wish they'd implement that in my home city of Montréal, Québec. We're facing huge traffic congestion because of construction. It's so bad it's actually costing lives due to driver impatience.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

It's because of everyone being forced back into the office to help "reinvigorate the downtown core" and to help landlords cover real estate costs

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Downtown Toronto too, please. This last year was the first time I have seen multiple emergency vehicles not being able to get to their destinations because of traffic gridlock. It's insane.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Dude Montreal is currently insanity. You couldn't pay me to drive there. Lovely city otherwise

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

Yeah. I live in Montreal and try to avoid driving anywhere if I can help it. That's why I got a place near a metro station not too far from downtown. I have bus routes that go to all the nice places in 20-30 minutes. And my neighborhood is awesome. Everything I need is walking distance and it's a cool place in the summer with lots of activities, bars, restaurants, specialty stores, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Nice. Now cars are only for the rich like they should be.

Real solution: Ban cars in parts of NYC.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Now cars are only for the rich

More that roads are for high occupancy or professional vehicles - buses, ambulances, construction vehicles, commercial trucks - that still need access to Manhattan but can't be placed on a train.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 6 days ago (2 children)

What was that saying again, something along the lines of: A great city is not where the poor own and drive cars, but the rich take public transportation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 111 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Right because everyone needing a car means everyone who can't afford one just automatically gets one.

Step one of reducing car-dependency is to reduce their number on the road. Then you can start bulding shit that accommodates the poor through actually nice-to-use public transit, bicycle paths, and walking routes.

Charge the rich. Build for the poor. Better yet, charge the rich, build for everyone. Not just cars. Because not everyone has cars.

Like FFS "good job now the poor can't drive" is hardly a comeback when it's like the most expensive mode of transit, massively subsidized with taxpayer money, just to kind of make it work. It wasn't something that could be made affordable or even efficient enough for everyone to use on a daily basis to begin with.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Zippity zoppity let's redistribute some property

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Banning cars actually works really well if you can prepare parking spaces or fully focus public transport

Source: Taksim Street

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Please elaborate the "if you can prepare parking spaces" part.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Multistory and underground parking spaces with a toll on how long a car stays, turkey has İSPARK which maintains this

This'll both allow people with cars to travel here, and will also lead to people preferring to walk or use public transport

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What time was this pic taken?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 days ago

This one was taken at 10:30 AM Eastern Time if that helps.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 days ago

...if it isn't the bridge I said I'd cross... Wait, not going to pay that congestion charge.

[–] [email protected] 189 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Outstanding move on NYC's part.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Prior to this going live there was a lot of talk about how congestion will simply move from one place to another. I don't know new york so can't name places but it was regarding commuters using a street or bridge that is now under congestion charge so they will flow an alternative route through roads that aren't designed for the additional traffic.

Is that now the case?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Unsure, I don't live in NYC. However, I can say that this will encourage many more people to take transit, which is good. Plus, I don't doubt that the tolled routes will still see active use by millions as they're still the fastest way to and from work.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 days ago (7 children)

Of all the things on Reddit, I miss remindmebot the most. They tried to kill it numerous times but it survived like a roach in radiation. On lemmy, I find an interesting question and have to set a timer for myself. This is the most first-world of problems, but I’m still moderately upset every time

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (13 children)

Some people may be inclined to go up and over Central Park to get to the other side without paying the $9. That likely only affects uptown residents. I can’t imagine anyone driving around the park from midtown to avoid the fee.

The only legitimate concerns I’ve read are from contractors with tools and small businesses who deliver. They should be offered exceptions if walking or mass transit are unrealistic options. You’re not riding the subway with acetylene tanks or delivering fresh meat on Metro North. Other than that, I love it.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The other concern I've heard, and has not been brought up in this thread yet, is the lobbying influence from rideshare companies to pass the congestion laws.

It's arguable that ride share vehicles are a better traffic density alternative to single rider personal vehicles, but there are pretty clear downsides to consider as well.

Source:

https://nypost.com/2025/01/04/us-news/uber-lyft-spent-millions-pushing-for-nyc-congestion-pricing-and-stand-to-make-killing/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

sure, but you can also deliver those with lighter vehicles that don't cause traffic. Congestion is congestion.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›