this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
-19 points (19.4% liked)

science

15026 readers
130 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Why does the brain need billions of neurons to process 10 bits/s? The stark contrast between these numbers remains unexplained...

Not so much. The stark contrast is the result of a set of stupid premises.

our sensory systems gather data at ∼1⁢0^9 bits/s.

Even In the 'machine model' of the brain this article appears to espouse ... vastly simplistic as it is ... the brain processes 10^9 bits of vision, audio, and kinetic clues which usually results in a limited but highly appropriate response ... often in much less than a second ... to gymnastic moves or crossing a busy street, driving a jet, performing on a violin, whatever. That response quickly arrives as the result of a model built on long experience of actual reality.

The authors fail to come up with -any- source (credible or not) for that ridiculous 10 bits/s number. Their model is so simplistic it isn't even worth engaging with.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

The authors fail to come up with -any- source (credible or not) for that ridiculous 10 bits/s number. Their model is so simplistic it isn’t even worth engaging with.

And yet I've seen this article like 5 times since Christmas on Lemmy. If it was all just for the joke that Lemmings process data a 2 bits/sec, once, I'd be fine with it, but this trend of being fire-hosed with manure since the US election ended is seriously making me consider if Lemmy is worth it anymore.