this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
407 points (97.2% liked)

Android

28169 readers
263 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

[email protected]


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not sure if this is the correct place to post, but I just wanna kinda rant a bit.

I'm not the only one that hates this, right?

An app can just do a "This App Does Not Allow Screenshots"? Like... wtf?

Like, its my phone, and some app can just decide to disable a fuction of my phone. It's my phone and if I wanna take a screenshot, I'm taking a screenshot. I don't care about whatever "security" the app developer wants.

Imagine if every online shopping app whether fast food or amazon, just used this to block you from taking a screenshot so you can't save the records in case of a dispute.

Which android developer thought it was a good idea to let an app disable a function on your phone. Even iPhone doesn't have this stupid concept.

Sorry for the rant.

Anyone wanna share your stories?

(P.S. I have a cheap secondary phone to take photos of the screen. "This App Does Not Allow Screenshots" my ass lmao, I'm taking the screenshot whether the app wants it or not.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 days ago (13 children)

Wanna know what's even more fucked up? Few years back, I had exactly this problem. Searched the internet for a solution. Guess what?

Enable Google Voice Assistant and say "Ok Google. Take a screenshot." Google magically has the rights to make a screenshot on the App that doesn't let you, the user, take the screenshot.

Next phone I get is gonna be something with a alternate OS, no Android or iOS.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The security argument is a lie, I think. I think websites like Netflix like these features so it's difficult to approach copying a video.

If security were an issue I don't think you'd be able to copy text to the clipboard in situations where you can't screenshot.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (9 children)

Microsoft teams limits your clipboard to 500 characters when you try to copy on the app. Of course blocks screenshots too. If I'm on a meeting that isn't being recorded, I now have no way of saving any pertinent information, and the ones that ARE recorded get automatically deleted after 30 days. 🤷🏽‍♀️

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I hate the whole bloody smartphone ecosystem for shit like this. Microsoft Palladium was widely seen as a nightmare scenario when it proposed ceding a bunch of user control to the OS and app developers a couple decades ago, even by the mainstream press. It seems Apple and Google used it as a roadmap, likely because people don't know how to use computers, and that doesn't seem to be improving.

The part of the modern mobile OS security model that does have merit is that apps aren't trusted. The PC model, even in multiuser operating systems with fancy permissions was that apps are user agents which are always doing something the user asked for, and therefore trusted as much as the user. The glut of spyware for Windows in the early 2000s proved that false.

The fact that somebody else doesn't know how to use a computer shouldn't force me to cede control over mine to participate in the modern world. Root is a bit of an escape hatch, but it's a blunt instrument on Android, and Google tries to help app developers stop me from using that as well. I'm starting to feel like Richard Stallman was right about everything and I should go be a digital hermit, only running software I compiled from source.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I hate this "feature" of the Dexcom GCM app. They seem to believe that HIPPA law prevents me from sharing my glucose readings with anyone I choose to.

To send readings to people, I can't screenshot the app but I can screenshot the notification which contains the same info 🤷🏼

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Just move to xdrip+, its better in every way than that steaming pile of garbage dexcom puts out. If your endo DEMANDS you use clarity and refuses ti use tidepool, you can generate a version of the dexcom app that outputs locally, and xdrip+ functions normally, and you can relegate the dexcom app to being opened every 3 months.

I love all the work people have put into the open source tools for this, because the first party apps are all garbage for "Fda approval reasons"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

Yep, same with the-shitty ass Kaiser Permanente app, which itself is just a webview wrapper around the crappy kp.org website. I cannot screenshot my test results, or any other screen within the app, but I can go to the same-ass page in my browser and take my screenshot from the website.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Aaaah! I'm so frustrated by this BS. Its MY phone. It should be MY choice.

Switching to GrapheneOS soon, and if the bank app(s) don't work, too bad. I'll use a (Linux) computer.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

I just switched to GraoheneOS and love it! All my financial apps worked out of the box.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

GOS does allow taking screenshots, but they come out to be an empty black image.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Ah, same with E/OS, I'm just seeing now. Never thought to test that!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (9 children)

GOS allows that to be bypassed?

Well fuck me, I wanna use Samsung Tags to track my cat, so can't really get a Pixel to use GOS.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Soooo... Any Magisk module that allows one to bypass this?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

There's is an LSPosed module called Disable-FLAG_SECURE that does this

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

There's an option in Developer options that'll allow to bypass that setting

Edit: this is on lineage OS but I can't find it in version 21 maybe it's on 20

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

What option is that? And which Android version?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago

Not sure what OS you are using. Are you using Graphene OS or something like that.

I'm on One UI (Samsung Variant of Android) and I just check through every row on Developer options, the only thing remotely related was an option that allows apps to overlay over the "Settings" app, which still wouldn't bypass an app specific restriction.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

I understand that for security compliance reasons. But beyond that, yupp. It sucks.

[–] [email protected] 83 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I fuckin hate that Playstation 4 and 5 do this for taking screenshots from movies. I just want to get a good screen grab for meme purposes! Do you think I'm going to screen shot every goddamn frame of a movie, one at a time, paste those back together as a video, then somehow rip the audio too, and then share this necromantically-assembled abomination with all my pirate buddies? Fuck you!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

god bless Digital Restrictions Management

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Now that is really stupid, especially given how easy it is to just fire up the movie on your PC and take a screenshot from there.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Netflix does this on windows too

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I was able to use snipping tool to take screenshots when I had Netflix, but I also used it through my browser.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Surely it blocks snipping tools new recording feature on windows 11 though right?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

I wouldn’t doubt it, but I’ve never used Windows 11 and never will >.>

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›